On Thu, 04 May 2017 17:36:32 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:03:43 -0800, joshu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs
> > with
> > the `:key(value)` syntax, however I found that it does not like this
> > syntax
> > is
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:03:43 -0800, joshu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs with
> the `:key(value)` syntax, however I found that it does not like this syntax
> is Rat's are used as the value, like this:
>
> > (:this(3.5) :that(5.3))
>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:03:43 -0800, joshu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs with
> the `:key(value)` syntax, however I found that it does not like this syntax
> is Rat's are used as the value, like this:
>
> > (:this(3.5) :that(5.3))
>
# New Ticket Created by Joshua
# Please include the string: [perl #130069]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130069 >
Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs with
the `:key(value)`
