On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:33:07 +0200, David Landgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gábor Szabó wrote:
What do you think about adding a has_license kwalitee to CPANTS ?
Checking if the META.yml has that entry ?
This will penalise all the modules that use ExtUtils::MakeMaker, which,
last time I
What do you think about adding a has_license kwalitee to CPANTS ?
Checking if the META.yml has that entry ?
For extra points you might also parse the module file to see if there
is copyright and license information and if they are the same as in META.yml
This will encourage people state clearly
Gábor Szabó wrote:
What do you think about adding a has_license kwalitee to CPANTS ?
Checking if the META.yml has that entry ?
This will penalise all the modules that use ExtUtils::MakeMaker, which,
last time I looked, does not generate the license metadata, even though
the module may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 19 September 2005 11:33, David Landgren wrote:
Gábor Szabó wrote:
What do you think about adding a has_license kwalitee to CPANTS ?
Checking if the META.yml has that entry ?
This will penalise all the modules that use ExtUtils::MakeMaker,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:33:07AM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
This will penalise all the modules that use ExtUtils::MakeMaker, which,
last time I looked, does not generate the license metadata, even though
the module may clearly state the license used in the documentation.
The latest alpha
