On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
>>> From 2005, but still a fantastic primer on testing in Perl.
> Sorry Tom.
> I think you must read a book about OO.
I will go back and review OO, Henk.
Thanks.
Best,
-Tom
[...]
From 2005, but still a fantastic primer on testing in Perl.
Sorry Tom.
I think you must read a book about OO.
Unsubscribing from this list now,
Regards,
Henk
(resending to p6u)
Tom (>>), Henk (>):
> > That doesn't seem to work with private methods. Any trick to accomplish
> > that?
>
> What part of 'private' did you mis?
Henk, that's an unnecessarily harsh way to say "Private methods are
private and not visible or testable outside of the class."
In
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Bruce Gray wrote:
>> Any recommendations for books on the subject?
> http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596100926.do
> Perl Testing: A Developer's Notebook
> by Ian Langworth and Chromatic
>
> From 2005, but still a fantastic primer on testing in P
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:28 AM, B. Estrade wrote:
> As good as this book is, it's still Perl 5 specific. So watch out if you're
> coming from Perl 5 land and Heaven forbid you're looking to do traditional
> things, you might get scolded for asking a reasonable question. o_O.
Roger!
Thanks, Bre
As good as this book is, it's still Perl 5 specific. So watch out if you're
coming from Perl 5 land and Heaven forbid you're looking to do traditional
things, you might get scolded for asking a reasonable question. o_O.
Brett
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen
wrote:
> > On 2
On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> From your and Henk's comments, I think I need to learn a lot more about
>> testing in general.
>
> Any recommendations for books on the subject?
>
> -Tom
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>> On 23 Mar 2015, at 14:11, Tom Browder wrote:
>> Any recommendations for books on the subject?
>
> Perl Testing - A Developer’s notebook:
Thanks, Liz--getting it!
-Tom
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 14:11, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> From your and Henk's comments, I think I need to learn a lot more about
>> testing in general.
> Any recommendations for books on the subject?
Perl Testing - A Developer’s notebook:
http://sh
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> From your and Henk's comments, I think I need to learn a lot more about
> testing in general.
Any recommendations for books on the subject?
-Tom
On Mar 23, 2015 3:19 AM, "Moritz Lenz" wrote:
> That said, I wonder why tests need introspection at all. I mean, you test
by
> doing example calls and comparing to expected example return values.
No argument from me. I am at the point of trying to replicate, in Perl 6,
somene else's test suite (
Hi,
On 03/23/2015 01:48 AM, Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
I'm trying to write a test.
To test what? Your own typo's?
The tests are for a public Perl 6 module trans
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
>> Do Perl 6 modules not need tests?
> Yes they need tests.
>> If so, which ones do they need?
> The public interface.
>> and which can be left off?
> The private stuff.
> You can not test for 'random_
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
I'm trying to write a test.
To test what? Your own typo's?
The tests are for a public Perl 6 module translated from an existing
Perl 5 module.
Do Perl 6 mo
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
>> I'm trying to write a test.
> To test what? Your own typo's?
The tests are for a public Perl 6 module translated from an existing
Perl 5 module.
Do Perl 6 modules not need tests? If so, which ones
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tom Browder
wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015 1:51 PM, "Tobias Leich" wrote:
if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
That doesn't seem to wo
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tom Browder
>> wrote:
>>> On Mar 20, 2015 1:51 PM, "Tobias Leich" wrote:
if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
>> That doesn't seem to work with private methods. An
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Tom Browder wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015 1:51 PM, "Tobias Leich" wrote:
if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
That doesn't seem to work with private methods. Any trick to accomplish that?
What part of 'private' did you mis?
I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2015 1:51 PM, "Tobias Leich" wrote:
>> if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
That doesn't seem to work with private methods. Any trick to accomplish that?
-Tom
On Mar 20, 2015 2:07 PM, "Will Coleda" wrote:
>
> > use Test;
> > class bar { method foo () {}}
> > ok bar.can("foo"), "stuff";
> ok 1 - stuff
Oops (I say as I slap my forehead)!
Thanks, Will.
-Tom
> use Test;
> class bar { method foo () {}}
> ok bar.can("foo"), "stuff";
ok 1 - stuff
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2015 1:50 PM, "Will Coleda" wrote:
>> class bar { method foo () {}}
>> my bar $a = bar.new();
>> say so $a.can("foo");
>
> Great!
>
>> I'm not s
On Mar 20, 2015 1:51 PM, "Tobias Leich" wrote:
> if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
Thanks, Tobias.
Cheers!
-Tom
On Mar 20, 2015 1:50 PM, "Will Coleda" wrote:
> class bar { method foo () {}}
> my bar $a = bar.new();
> say so $a.can("foo");
Great!
> I'm not sure this warrants a new _ok method.
How would you do it with an existing test?
Thanks, Will.
Cheers!
-Tom
if $obj.^can($method_name) {...
Am 20.03.2015 um 19:38 schrieb Tom Browder:
> I am trying to create a testing subroutine to detect if a class object
> has a certain method.
>
> I want it to look something like this:
>
> my $obj = Foo.new();
> can_ok($obj, 'method1');
>
> sub can_ok($obj, Str
class bar { method foo () {}}
my bar $a = bar.new();
say so $a.can("foo");
True
my Int $b;
say so $b.can("foo");
False
I'm not sure this warrants a new _ok method.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I am trying to create a testing subroutine to detect if a class object
> ha
I am trying to create a testing subroutine to detect if a class object
has a certain method.
I want it to look something like this:
my $obj = Foo.new();
can_ok($obj, 'method1');
sub can_ok($obj, Str $method_name) {
if $obj.{$method_name}:exists {
say "ok";
return True;
26 matches
Mail list logo
