On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 5:21 AM Darren Duncan wrote:
>
> match this pattern initially, but
>
> fully declarative
Do you consider `> .*` to be declarative?
If so, what about:
```
my token nonquoted_alphanumeric_text
{
<[ A..Z _ a..z ]> <[ 0..9 A..Z _ a..z ]>*
&
>
Hi Darren,
Glad that's useful. FYI, I was trying to get you an answer using the `&&`
Conjunction method as well, but fell short because you want to filter out
certain literal words (i.e. negation). That's why I simplified your regex
pattern to ` + `. I trust you know your specifications.
Thank you William, that boolean condition check option looks like it is in the
direction of the answer I sought.
FYI, the reason I spelled out the character class explicitly rather than using
"" was because I wanted it strictly applied to ASCII chars and not
everything Unicode considers a
Hi Darren (and Marcel),
Two different approaches:
https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes#Conjunction:_&;
>From the docs:
*"For example if you have a regex quoted that matches a quoted string, then
`/ && <-[x]>* /` matches a quoted string that does not contain the
character `x`."*
Second
On 30-07-2023 06:21, Darren Duncan wrote:
Hello, I have a Raku regex question.
See the following:
token nonquoted_alphanumeric_text
{
>
<[ A..Z _ a..z ]> <[ 0..9 A..Z _ a..z ]>*
}
What I want is for "nonquoted_alphanumeric_text" to match any simple
ASCII bareword
Hello, I have a Raku regex question.
See the following:
token nonquoted_alphanumeric_text
{
>
<[ A..Z _ a..z ]> <[ 0..9 A..Z _ a..z ]>*
}
What I want is for "nonquoted_alphanumeric_text" to match any simple ASCII
bareword EXCEPT a few special cases indicated in the
