On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:21 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> What does perl-autodie do (RHEL 7)?
Here it is well explained:
<http://search.cpan.org/~pjf/autodie-2.29/lib/autodie.pm>.
Luca
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:06 AM, ToddAndMargo
wrote:
> My concern is that it will affect the operation of perl 5
It's a pragma that has to be explicitly enabled (`use autodie; ...`). It
won't change the default behavior.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On 11/20/2016 07:26 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:21 PM,
ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com>
wrote:
What
does perl-autodie do (
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:21 PM, ToddAndMargo
wrote:
> What does perl-autodie do (RHEL 7)?
>
> yum install perl-autodie
>
> And why is it necessary to get Perl 6 to work?
>
It's normally part of a Perl install, but RH loves to break Perl by
installing only about half
What does perl-autodie do (RHEL 7)?
yum install perl-autodie
And why is it necessary to get Perl 6 to work?
G'day Josh / p5p / p6l,
given ($@) {
# [snip]
default{ say "Not an autodie exception." }
}
If you're going to write that into some documentation, I wish you'd
make default say that it's exception suicid
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Paul Fenwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, when testing exceptions from autodie, we can use:
>
>given ($@) {
>when (undef) { say "No errors here" }
>when ('open') { say &q
Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:42:33AM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: However, I think we are now officially *way* off topic for Perl6...
Not really--a Klingon army is a *parallel* processor, and just because
one Klingon dies doesn't mean the whole army should suddenly die too.
Tradi
Mark J. Reed schrieb:
I think the simplest and most Klingonlike expression of the sentiment
is simply this: yIQap pagh yIHegh! (Succeed or die!)
But you could say something like: SuvwI' yIDa: yIHegh! bIlujchugh yIcheghQo'!
(Behave as a warrior: die! If you fail, do not return!)
Thanks for
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The catch block is lexically contained within the try block, so the
> inviolate nature of the curlies remains intact.
thank you.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:42:33AM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: However, I think we are now officially *way* off topic for Perl6...
Not really--a Klingon army is a *parallel* processor, and just because
one Klingon dies doesn't mean the whole army should suddenly die too.
Traditional exception han
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Roland Giersig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> batlh yiHegh SuvwI'mo! yIcheghbe' lujwI'mo'!
> Die honorably as a warrior! Do not return as a looser!
Not quite. mo' means "because of the ", so the above says
something like 'die because of the warrior', 'return because
Paul Fenwick wrote:
[1] Klingon semantics: It is better to die() in the attempt than to
return() in failure. I'll buy a beverage for whomever can help me
translate that back into Klingon in time for OSCON. ;)
The concept of "better ... than" is difficult to express and not very
warrior-like.
The catch block is lexically contained within the try block, so the
inviolate nature of the curlies remains intact.
On 6/3/08, David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>* Exception handlers run in the lexical context o
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Exception handlers run in the lexical context of the block being
>tried.
>* Exception handlers run in the dynamic context of the code that is
>failing.
the first seems dangerous, esp. considering the
ally start parsing and calling functions, there is
no distinction at all between different versions of "open", say.
I think that chromatic's suggestion of roles is an excellent one. In P5 we
certainly do have a concept of built-in (core) functions, and if nothing
else autodie uses t
G'day chromatic / p5p / p6l,
Make a list of all possible types of exceptions, define them as roles, and
group them that way. Any given exception can implement multiple roles (:CORE
and :io, for example, or a specialization of that role that also does :USER).
Excellent point. I've been large
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:31:34PM +1000, Paul Fenwick wrote:
> G'day p6l and p5p,
>
> I'm currently working on the 'autodie' pragma for Perl 5, which is
> essentially 'Fatal' but with lexical scope. It's similar to the 'fatal'
> pra
make before I start fleshing
> out the hierarchy for p5 autodie?
Hierarchies suck, especially singly-rooted hierarchies. Then again,
multiply-rooted hierarchies turn into big cyclic graphs.
Make a list of all possible types of exceptions, define them as roles, and
group them that way. An
G'day p6l and p5p,
I'm currently working on the 'autodie' pragma for Perl 5, which is
essentially 'Fatal' but with lexical scope. It's similar to the 'fatal'
pragma described in S04/Exceptions.
autodie is implementing an exception hierarchy f
20 matches
Mail list logo
