[perl #131247] [REGRESSION] )> in regex results in stuff being matched wrongly ( /)> . <(/ )

2017-05-04 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Tue, 02 May 2017 14:51:47 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > say "abc" ~~ /)> . <(/ > > > Result (2015.12 … 2017.03): > # > > > Result (2017.04.3, HEAD(701dab3)) > ｢bc｣ > > > > ｢bc｣ is definitely wrong and # is kinda right. > > Bisectable points to these two commits: > * >

[perl #131247] [REGRESSION] )> in regex results in stuff being matched wrongly ( /)> . <(/ )

2017-05-04 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Tue, 02 May 2017 14:51:47 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > say "abc" ~~ /)> . <(/ > > > Result (2015.12 … 2017.03): > # > > > Result (2017.04.3, HEAD(701dab3)) > ｢bc｣ > > > > ｢bc｣ is definitely wrong and # is kinda right. > > Bisectable points to these two commits: > * >

[perl #131254] Useless use warning from infix macro

2017-05-04 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Benjamin Goldberg # Please include the string: [perl #131254] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131254 > m: use experimental :macros; macro infix:($a, $b) { return quasi { {{{$a}}} +

[perl #130069] [BUG] Unknown QAST error when creating List of Pairs

2017-05-04 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:03:43 -0800, joshu...@gmail.com wrote: > Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs with > the `:key(value)` syntax, however I found that it does not like this syntax > is Rat's are used as the value, like this: > > > (:this(3.5) :that(5.3)) >

[perl #130069] [BUG] Unknown QAST error when creating List of Pairs

2017-05-04 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:03:43 -0800, joshu...@gmail.com wrote: > Normally Rakudo is happy for you to omit comma when declaring pairs with > the `:key(value)` syntax, however I found that it does not like this syntax > is Rat's are used as the value, like this: > > > (:this(3.5) :that(5.3)) >

[perl #126998] [IO] Use of Proc with IO::Pipe is counter-intuitive

2017-05-04 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:05:41 -0800, vyt...@gmail.com wrote: > Following script throws error ( "Aborted (core dumped)" ) when $id == > 1007. This is because $p.err is really never closed. however, what I > find intriguing is if I remove "my $output = $p.err.slurp-rest;" line > it works fine. None

[perl #128866] [BUG] Array[Int] ~~ Array[Numeric] is false

2017-05-04 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 03:51:27 -0700, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote: > say Array[Int] ~~ Array[Int]; # True > say Array[Int] ~~ Positional[Numeric]; # True > say Positional[Int] ~~ Positional[Numeric]; # True > say Array[Int] ~~ Array[Numeric]; # False > > The last one should be true as well. How

[perl #128866] [BUG] Array[Int] ~~ Array[Numeric] is false

2017-05-04 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 03:51:27 -0700, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote: > say Array[Int] ~~ Array[Int]; # True > say Array[Int] ~~ Positional[Numeric]; # True > say Positional[Int] ~~ Positional[Numeric]; # True > say Array[Int] ~~ Array[Numeric]; # False > > The last one should be true as well. How

[perl #131245] [BUG] Ghost elements in array

2017-05-04 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by shreya...@yahoo.com # Please include the string: [perl #131245] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131245 > # create an array of 5 elements, remove 2, add a fifth one leaving 4th empty $

Re: [perl #131239] where clause thunk's return value used for smartmatching

2017-05-04 Thread Parrot Raiser via RT
If Zoffix gets this confused, maybe the explanation needs some work for mere mortals? On 4/30/17, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:47:16 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > >> The correct way to write that would be to use `&`. > > And .so on .name >

Re: [perl #125463] [JVM] .IO.unlink succeeds in unlinking empty directories

2017-05-04 Thread The Sidhekin via RT
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Rob Hoelz via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > Perl 5 signals failure when the file doesn't exist: > > $ touch one > $ perl -le 'print unlink("one") ? 1 : 0' > 1 > $ perl -le 'print unlink("one") ? 1 : 0' > 0 > Not exactly. Perl5 unlink is

[perl #131255] Configure failure of Rakudo Star Release 2017.04 on ARM

2017-05-04 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Parrot Raiser # Please include the string: [perl #131255] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131255 > Unfortunately, install processes is broken on ARM (R Pi). The configure process has a