# New Ticket Created by raiph
# Please include the string: [perl #131406]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131406 >
put $*PERL.compiler.version; # 2017.05.303.g.5.e.3393454
use NativeCall; put
Please do not weaken the link between REPL and perl6 !
The ability to test perl6 snippets very quickly is something I find very
useful. And to get this I type 'perl6'. Easy to remember.
(I have been following perl6 since the very beginning, and installed
'pug'. Since perl6 has been
Original bug report: https://github.com/Bailador/Bailador/issues/119
$ bailador
Usage:
/Applications/Rakudo/share/perl6/site/resources/71985446A5DBC3EB1694DCE3776293A522E54A58
--help (shows this help)
Hi
Exit code is set after closing one of the output channels. If you close
both, the errorcode is reset to 0 again. (This might be a bug though)
my $p = run "ls", "dadsad", :out, :err;
say $p.err.lines;
---> (ls: cannot access 'dadsad': No such file or directory)
$p.out.close;
$p.exitcode;
# New Ticket Created by "brian d foy"
# Please include the string: [perl #131408]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131408 >
I have this program:
#!/Applications/Rakudo/bin/perl6
use Test;
That is so easy for a programmer to implement; I have an "nyi"
subroutine/function in the my skeleton scripts for both Perl 5 and
Bash. Is it worth cluttering the language?
Hi
I wonder if there is auto-completion in the Perl6 REPL - such as what is
found in Eclipse (Ctrl-space) or in vim (Ctrl+n) - for variables,
methods, ...
e.g
perl6
> say 42.
or
> my $result = 8;
> say $res
Thanks
--
Sébastien Moretti
On 05/30/2017 08:33 PM, Sebastien Moretti wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder if there is auto-completion in the Perl6 REPL - such as what is
> found in Eclipse (Ctrl-space) or in vim (Ctrl+n) - for variables,
> methods, ...
>
> e.g
> perl6
> > say 42.
> or
> > my $result = 8;
> > say $res
>
Hi,
As it
On 05/30/2017 05:39 PM, Shrivats wrote:
On 05/30/2017 08:33 PM, Sebastien Moretti wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder if there is auto-completion in the Perl6 REPL - such as what is
> found in Eclipse (Ctrl-space) or in vim (Ctrl+n) - for variables,
> methods, ...
>
> e.g
> perl6
> > say 42.
>
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder
# Please include the string: [perl #131400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131400 >
To demonstrate the bug, run:
$ perl6 --doc=Text S26-documentation.pod
The source
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:19:22 -0700, tbrowder wrote:
> To demonstrate the bug, run:
>
> $ perl6 --doc=Text S26-documentation.pod
>
> The source file of S26-documentation.pod can be found at:
>
> https://github.com/perl6/specs/S26-documentation.pod
>
> Perl 6 version: 2017.05.16-g494659a
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:19:22 -0700, tbrowder wrote:
> To demonstrate the bug, run:
>
> $ perl6 --doc=Text S26-documentation.pod
>
> The source file of S26-documentation.pod can be found at:
>
> https://github.com/perl6/specs/S26-documentation.pod
>
> Perl 6 version: 2017.05.16-g494659a
Completion (albeit in a limited form) is available if you install the Linenoise
module. Completion for Readline is
a little trickier, since GNU Readline uses a global variable to store the
function reference used to populate the
completion list. When I was working on the REPL stuff,
The REPL's almost an independent project.
Can it be made modular, to reduce the coupling between it and the language?
It's pretty modular already; only a little more work would be needed to have it
loaded as an external module.
On Tue, 30 May 2017 12:34:08 -0400
Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The REPL's almost an independent project.
>
> Can it be made modular, to reduce the coupling between it
As already mentioned, we have three such stubbers already. You can even put
a partial/incomplete implementation after them: just terminate the ... or
w/e with a semicolon.
What none of them will do for you is allow a syntactically incorrect body.
But the proposed feature *also* will not allow
As already mentioned, we have three such stubbers already. You can even put
a partial/incomplete implementation after them: just terminate the ... or
w/e with a semicolon.
What none of them will do for you is allow a syntactically incorrect body.
But the proposed feature *also* will not allow
# New Ticket Created by Benjamin Goldberg
# Please include the string: [perl #131401]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131401 >
In C, it’s possible to use typedefs for all sorts of things, including:
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:19:22 -0700, tbrowder wrote:
> To demonstrate the bug, run:
>
> $ perl6 --doc=Text S26-documentation.pod
>
> The source file of S26-documentation.pod can be found at:
>
> https://github.com/perl6/specs/S26-documentation.pod
>
> Perl 6 version: 2017.05.16-g494659a
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:19:22 -0700, tbrowder wrote:
> To demonstrate the bug, run:
>
> $ perl6 --doc=Text S26-documentation.pod
>
> The source file of S26-documentation.pod can be found at:
>
> https://github.com/perl6/specs/S26-documentation.pod
>
> Perl 6 version: 2017.05.16-g494659a
20 matches
Mail list logo
