On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:02:15 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:30:24 -0700, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think the problem is that there's already another syntax using that
> > sequence: coercion types. FF(FF(2)) is being parsed as a coercion
> > type from
> >
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:30:24 -0700, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think the problem is that there's already another syntax using that
> sequence: coercion types. FF(FF(2)) is being parsed as a coercion type from
> FF to FF(... and then it falls over because it's not expecting nested
> coercion typ