This is because the implementation of infix:(Rat:D, Rat:D) is kind
of bad:
multi sub infix:(Rational:D \a, Rational:D \b) is default {
a.Num cmp b.Num
}
We'll have to do a proper comparison of rats, rather than convert to Num
which can give wrong results like this.
On 23/02/17 04
Actually, I was mistaken. The code i pointed at there already works for
this very case. observe:
131338 timotimo │ m: say 4.999 cmp 5.0
131338 +camelia │ rakudo-moar 1811b8: OUTPUT: «Less»
The real problem is this implementation of &infix::
multi sub infix:(Real:D \a,
# New Ticket Created by Radek
# Please include the string: [perl #130847]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130847 >
I want to install perl6 modules. I installed Rakudo Star on windows 7.
which perl6
C:/rakudo/bi
Sounds good! Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Timo Paulssen via RT <
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> Now the exception also contains the error as reported by libuv:
>
> timo@schmand /tmp> perl6 CounterMutexSingleton.pl6 --num_threads=253
> Could not create a new Thread: to
Indeed :) It was just a simple test case to demonstrate some things to
ab5tract.
Thanks for your work!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Timo Paulssen via RT <
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've put in an improved error message for when libuv refuses to create an
> eventloop fo
Try "zef update"
S
On 23 February 2017 at 14:49, Radek wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Radek
> # Please include the string: [perl #130847]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130847 >
>
>
> I want to install per
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:32:31 -0800, comdog wrote:
> Here's a curious change over in precision:
>
> > 4.999 ~~ 0..^5
> True
> > 4. ~~ 0..^5
> False
>
> I figure this is an implementation detail that ties to storage, but
> one of the selling points of Per
Somewhat offtopic:
toolforger: p6: say Inf cmp Inf
camelia: rakudo-moar 320c2f: OUTPUT: «Same»
I.e. Inf compares equal to itself - is this intentional?
On 2017-02-23 10:00 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
Somewhat offtopic:
toolforger: p6: say Inf cmp Inf
camelia: rakudo-moar 320c2f: OUTPUT: «Same»
I.e. Inf compares equal to itself - is this intentional?
Even if that isn't valid mathematically, for our purposes in a programming
language, Inf i
