Re: [perl #130965] [LTA] `but role { ... }` interacts strangely with outer lexicals, and doesn't warn about it

On 09/03/17 20:38, jn...@jnthn.net via RT wrote: > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:39:39 -0800, elizabeth wrote: >> But I’ll settle for a warning / exceptione :-) > I think these options are worth consideration. I can't think of a false > positive off hand. class Test { method tester { say "testest" } }

[perl #131008] lcm should not work with Nums, and maybe gcd too (2.5 lcm 5)

# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #131008] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131008 > Code: say 2.5 lcm 5 Result: 10 Looking at the implementation, it c

[perl #131009] [CONSISTENCY] Return type and containerization of `[]` metaops

# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #131009] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131009 > While adding a test[^1] it was discovered that `[]` metaops containerize their product so