[perl #131590] .cando fails to locate candidates with native parameters

2017-06-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #131590] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131590 > Using .cando, the method with native str param doesn't get found, even when using native

[perl #131592] [ASYNC][REGRESSION] Piping from one Proc to another occasionally dies with "his process is not opened for write"

2017-06-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #131592] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131592 > zoffix@VirtualBox~/CPANPRC/rakudo (nom)$ cat bar.p6 for ^4000 { my $p = ru

Announce: Rakudo Perl 6 compiler, Release #112 (2017.06)

2017-06-17 Thread zoffix
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I’m very happy to announce the June 2017 release of Rakudo Perl 6 #112. Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Moar Virtual Machine[^1]. This release implements the 6.c version of the Perl 6 specifications. It includes bugfixes and optimizations on

[perl #131593] [BUG][REGRESSION] Failure to sink values in for loops

2017-06-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #131593] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131593 > This a two part report: 1) It appears in some cases a for loop doesn't sink stuff. Which

[perl #131592] [ASYNC][REGRESSION] Piping from one Proc to another occasionally dies with "his process is not opened for write"

2017-06-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
P.S.: the test for this ticket already exists as test #2 in t/spec/S17-procasync/stress.t It's an old test that now flops once in a while.

[perl #131592] [ASYNC][REGRESSION] Piping from one Proc to another occasionally dies with "his process is not opened for write"

2017-06-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
P.S.: the test for this ticket already exists as test #2 in t/spec/S17-procasync/stress.t It's an old test that now flops once in a while.