[perl #117481] [BUG] duplicate keys in .gist in Match of regex which backtracked in Rakudo

2013-04-04 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak # Please include the string: [perl #117481] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=117481 p6eval rakudo 99e27f: OUTPUT«「/foo/bar/baz/」␤ dirname = 「/foo/bar/baz/」␤

Re: [perl #117481] [BUG] duplicate keys in .gist in Match of regex which backtracked in Rakudo

2013-04-04 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:09:36PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote: p6eval rakudo 99e27f: OUTPUT«「/foo/bar/baz/」␤ dirname = 「/foo/bar/baz/」␤ dirname = 「/foo/bar/」␤ basename = 「baz」␤␤» labster okay, why do I get two copies of dirname when the match only succeeds once? masak huuhhnn. masak wut. masak

[perl #113950] [BUG] 'next' or 'last' don't trigger LEAVE phaser in loop in Rakudo

2013-04-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Mon Jul 02 07:02:11 2012, masak wrote: masak r: loop { last; LEAVE say bye! }; say outside p6eval rakudo 16db64: OUTPUT«outside␤» masak do we have this one on file? masak closest I find is https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=113548 * masak submits rakudobug masak r: for ^10 {

[perl #76896] perl6 - sub/hash syntax

2013-04-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sun Aug 01 07:19:06 2010, ekkehor...@googlemail.com wrote: The script: use v6; my %fs = (); %fs{ lc( 'A' ) } = fa; sub fa() { return 'fa called.'; } ; %fs{ lc( 'B' ) } = fb; sub fb() { return 'fb called.'; } my $fn =

[perl #100746] [BUG] Something is wrong with $_ topicalization in statement_mod 'for' and 'given' in Rakudo

2013-04-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Wed Oct 05 06:05:05 2011, masak wrote: masak nom: my $t = q[%foo% %bar% %foo% %baz%]; my %b = foo = 1, bar = 2, baz = 3; $t.=subst(%{.key}%, .value, :g) for %b.pairs; say $t p6eval nom 4f19b7: OUTPUT«Method 'key' not found for invocant of class 'Any' [...] masak b: my $t = q[%foo% %bar%

[perl #105118] Range's min/max don't take a comparator

2013-04-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Dec 27 05:28:45 2011, Kris.Shannon wrote: This looks like a DUP of #63716 From that ticket: S03:2885 describes slightly different semantics for .min and .max in Ranges, and doesn't mention an Ordering parameter at all. Rejecting ticket. -- Will Coke Coleda