Re: rakudo Test module: expanding tests considered?

On Mar 24, 2015 3:44 AM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen l...@dijkmat.nl wrote: On 23 Mar 2015, at 23:50, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Question: Would it be better to submit pull requests for some (or all

Re: rakudo Test module: expanding tests considered?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen l...@dijkmat.nl wrote: On 23 Mar 2015, at 23:50, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Question: Would it be better to submit pull requests for some (or all) for the rakudo Test module or start creating a new Test::* module? Good

rakudo Test module: expanding tests considered?

I have some tests needed for a Perl 5 module I'm trying to translate from Perl 5 to Perl 6 that aren't available yet. Question: Would it be better to submit pull requests for some (or all) for the rakudo Test module or start creating a new Test::* module? Thanks. Best, -Tom

Re: Announce: Rakudo Perl 6 compiler, Development Release #92 (“Niceville”)

On Oct 23, 2015 7:21 AM, "Will Coleda" wrote: > On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I’m very happy to announce the October > 2015 release of Rakudo Perl 6 #92 “Niceville”. As the founder of the Niceville Perl Mongers (one member so far), I presume to speak for our little

Re: [perl #128282] Inconsistent use of snake_case and kebob-case in Test.pm6

On Sunday, May 29, 2016, Zoffix Znet wrote: ... > I'm willing to do the work, if the proposal is accepted. The question then > becomes: should the old names stay? > I support your proposal for kebob-casing. -Tom [tbrowder]

Re: Panda failure

On Monday, June 27, 2016, The Holy Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > I managed to build the rakudo-star perl6 compiler, I hope I am in the > right place for this : > > How did you build it, with rakudobrew? Or following what instructions? -Tom

Fwd: Panda failure

Sent to the wrong person. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Parrot Raiser* <1parr...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, June 27, 2016 Subject: Panda failure To: Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> See the attached bash script for an example that works for me. get_rakudo Descrip

[perl #127330] [SLOW] 10_000 lines with ｢say ‘a’;｣ take 16 seconds to run

On Thursday, January 21, 2016, Elizabeth Mattijsen > wrote: > > > On 21 Jan 2016, at 00:42, Alex Jakimenko (via RT) < > perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> > ... > As you can see, most of the time is spent parsing the file, and then >

Re: My personal benchmark shows no improvement with Rakudo 2016.02

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > Which may not have been a good idea :-) > > I’m afraid it fell through the cracks here. Could you get me on track again? > I promise I’ll look at it today! Sure, Liz (I don't know how you keep up with all you

My personal benchmark shows no improvement with Rakudo 2016.02

Note that my read of a 10 Gb file shows no significant speed-up from Rakudo 2016.01 to 2016.02. Best regards, -Tom

Re: My personal benchmark shows no improvement with Rakudo 2016.02

I gave my code to Liz. -Tom On Monday, February 22, 2016, Brent Laabs <bsla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Without a code sample or statistics, there's not much we can do about it. > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e

Static code checker research worth investigating (Communications of the ACM, 03/2016, Vol. 59, No. 03, p. 99)

Interesting article in latest issue of subject titled: "A Differential Approach to Undefined Behavior Detection" which may describe procedures not used in other static analysis programs. Article references the authors' website here: http://css.csail.mit.edu/stack which contains more info

Re: [perl #127823] Need ssize_t for Rakudo NativeCall

On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Tobias Leich via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > You can define them yourself: > > native size_t is Int is ctype("size_t") is unsigned is repr("P6int") { }; > native ssize_t is Int is ctype("size_t") is repr("P6int") { }; Thanks, Tobias!

Re: [BUG] Rakudo docs not converted to man nor installed for "make install"

On Tuesday, May 10, 2016, Sam S. via RT wrote: > What docs? > > The ones in the 'docs/' folder in the git repo? > Those seem to be project docs aimed at developers working on Rakudo, not > at users of Rakudo. > I.e. that folder is basically used as a project wiki. >

[perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

On Monday, July 11, 2016, Will Coleda via RT > wrote: > On Sat Jul 09 13:51:07 2016, tbrowder wrote: > > Need a pod2man translator. > Does this need to be shipped with the rakudo compiler? Since the perl6

Re: Questions on using other "modules" in nqp

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > My short answer would be that there's not a shortcut way in NQP > to avoid the fully-qualified sub names. I'm doubtful that we want > to duplicate Perl 6's import mechanism into NQP. That's all I need to know.

Re: [perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > I think any pod2man translator program should be separate from Rakudo > itself. > > If --help mentions a man page, it's probably sufficient to ship Rakudo > with an already-translated man page, rather than shipping the

NQP and Pod

I am trying to debug a P6 pod problem, and the problem code seems to be in file: rakudo/src/Perl6/Pod.nqp My question is how can I access code in that file? + Can I write an nqp script, use the Perl6::Pod module, and operate that way? + How do I feed a chunk of pod to the routines? Any help

Questions on using other "modules" in nqp

I have added a file "DebugPod.nqp" in the directory rakudo/src/Perl6 and want to use it for debugging other files in that directory. Following the format of the "Pod.nqp" file in that directory, I have structured my new file this way: Perl6::DebugPod { our sub debug_rows($desc, @rows)

Re: Questions on using other "modules" in nqp

ping On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have added a file "DebugPod.nqp" in the directory rakudo/src/Perl6 > and want to use it for debugging other files in that directory. > > Following the format of the "Pod.nq

Re: Panda failure

On Monday, June 27, 2016, The Holy Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > I managed to build the rakudo-star perl6 compiler, I hope I am in the > right place for this : ... Is there any reason you haven't used the rakudobrew method? Especially if you want to keep up with the

Re: NQP and Pod

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Will Coleda <w...@coleda.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am trying to debug a P6 pod problem, and the problem code seems to be in >> file: >> >> rakudo/src/Per

Re: [perl #129252] routines sprintf and printf need auto newline capability

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > Just curious, but what is wrong with "say fmt()" ? Liz, one reason, i'm ashamed to say, is lack of familiarity with fmt() (too many years of C/C++ and Perl 5, I guess). The printf family I am very aware of and am

Re: [perl #129252] routines sprintf and printf need auto newline capability

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > On Sun Sep 11 13:48:04 2016, tbrowder wrote: >> Both routines need an alias (or adverb) so that a newline is ... > I'd prefer to avoid adding two new subs and two new methods for the sake of > saving a

Re: [perl #129252] routines sprintf and printf need auto newline capability

On Sunday, September 11, 2016, Zoffix Znet via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sun Sep 11 15:29:45 2016, tbrowder wrote: > > Uh, say "what?" :) Just a little humour. Someone thought thought it was worth it to not have to explicitly add the newline on print, and I feel the same

Re: [perl #129252] [RFC] routines sprintf and printf need auto newline capability

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > On Sun Sep 11 15:29:45 2016, tbrowder wrote: >> Uh, say "what?" :) > > I don't think that works as a justification. The put() is used much more > frequently than printf(), > so it makes sense to have it as

Re: [perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:22 PM, David Warring wrote: > # New Ticket Created by David Warring > # Please include the string: [perl #129862] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129862

Re: [perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > > PR merged[^1]; tests needed. > > [1] > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/7af9ec9d90d4ec8e9732e979729df85a80f7ec11 See perl/roast PR 168.

Re: [BUG] Perl 6 text file line read is much slower than Perl 5

On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > Would you believe it used to be a lot slower still? > > Anyways, what does P6/P5 mean?? If it’s the runtimes divided, I get > values between 9 and 10 or so. Which would be less surprising to me.

Re: [perl #130207] [RESOLVED] [SITE] directory "/downloads/rakudo" needs a "latest" entry to ease automating installation procedures

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > According to our records, your request regarding > "[SITE] directory "/downloads/rakudo" needs a "latest" entry to ease > automating installation procedures" > has been resolved. > > If you have any

Re: [perl #131543] [FEATURE_REQUEST] Add line number method to IO::Handle

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 07:45 Zoffix Znet via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > ution to me, ... > but if you really want the `.ln` > method, create a module that mixes it in. IO::CatHandle::AutoLines does > what you want for cat > handles, so you should be able to re-use a lot of its

Re: [perl #129941] [PERF] [IO] Perl 6 text file line read is much slower than Perl 5

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:23 jn...@jnthn.net via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:27:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > On Sat Oct 22 04:24:15 2016, tbrowder wrote: > > > See for a suite > > > of tests that show

Re: [perl #132195] Feature request: Have Test.pm6 tests accept an optional second description.

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 17:23 Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:10:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: ... > My vote on this feature is a most definite -1. I see no reason to > over-engineer a core module to support some fringe usecase. > The tests routines

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) WILCO!

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

I am working on this issue and would like ownership of it.

[perl #127305] EXPORT ignored when unit module/package is used

In a conversation about this issue on IRC channel #perl6 on 25 Oct 2016 starting at approx 06:24, module authors and users express concern about modules polluting the user's namespace. Several main desires IMHO: User: 1. Selective import by object name(s) or tag(s). 2. Selective import by

Re: [perl #131543] [FEATURE_REQUEST] Add line number method to IO::Handle

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 07:45 Zoffix Znet via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > ution to me, ... > but if you really want the `.ln` > method, create a module that mixes it in. IO::CatHandle::AutoLines does > what you want for cat > handles, so you should be able to re-use a lot of its

Re: [perl #129941] [PERF] [IO] Perl 6 text file line read is much slower than Perl 5

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:23 jn...@jnthn.net via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 03:27:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > On Sat Oct 22 04:24:15 2016, tbrowder wrote: > > > See for a suite > > > of tests that show

Re: [perl #132195] Feature request: Have Test.pm6 tests accept an optional second description.

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 17:23 Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:10:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: ... > My vote on this feature is a most definite -1. I see no reason to > over-engineer a core module to support some fringe usecase. > The tests routines

[perl #132195] Feature request: Have Test.pm6 tests accept an optional second description.

On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 18:16:34 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 17:23 Zoffix Znet via RT > wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:10:55 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > ... > > My vote on this feature is a most definite -1. I see no reason to > > over-engineer a core

[perl #132156] [LTA] Suggest polymod for bases > 36 (9123607.base(37))

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:01:55 -0700, elizabeth wrote: > > > On 25 Sep 2017, at 08:21, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > > wrote: > > > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > > # Please include the string: [perl #132156] > > # in the

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #124403] [POD] Table parsing broken in rakudo

tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #132341] [POD] table handling should ensure table rows have the same number of cells even if they are empty

Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #129862] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

Root problem is fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #124403] [POD] Table parsing broken in rakudo

Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

Fixed by PR #1240.

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) WILCO!

[perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:21:04 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) > > > WILCO! Expected "=end comment" to terminate "=begin comment"; found "=end table"

[perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:16:23 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:21:04 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > > > > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) > > > > > > WILCO! $ cat prob.p6 use

[perl #124281] colonpairs in [POD] config options always produce strings

closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #126742] [POD] config items should not include quotes for string values

closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #130477] [BUG][POD] Pod config parses colopairs but simply stringifies whatever it matched

closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #132632] [POD][NYI]. List and hash configuration value formats are not yet implemented (NYI)

closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #132632] [POD][NYI]. List and hash configuration value formats are not yet implemented (NYI)

closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #126742] [POD] config items should not include quotes for string values

closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #124281] colonpairs in [POD] config options always produce strings

closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371