On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:46:38 -0700, zef...@fysh.org wrote:
> > (9.999e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> 287369
> > (9.99895e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> -103256
>
> The above computations show, scaled up, the difference between a Num value
> and the exact value
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:46:38 -0700, zef...@fysh.org wrote:
> > (9.999e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> 287369
> > (9.99895e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> -103256
>
> The above computations show, scaled up, the difference between a Num value
> and the exact value
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>as of b5aa3c5, these both output 287369 now.
For clarity, that's still bad rounding, then.
-zefram
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:46:38 -0700, zef...@fysh.org wrote:
> > (9.999e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> 287369
> > (9.99895e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
> -103256
>
> The above computations show, scaled up, the difference between a Num value
> and the exact value
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #128912]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128912 >
> (9.999e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58
287369
> (9.99895e-5 *
