On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:31:58 -0800, sidhe...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Brandon Allbery
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Zefram
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The same goes for coercions from other enum types.
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Zefram
> wrote:
>
>> The same goes for coercions from other enum types.
>
>
> This should be your hint. Enums *are* numeric, specifically Int.
> I don't
The discussion I'm thinking of starts around here:
http://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2017-03-04#l1490
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Zefram wrote:
> Brandon Allbery via RT wrote:
> >In any case I am specifically thinking of a discussion recently in IRC
>
Brandon Allbery via RT wrote:
>In any case I am specifically thinking of a discussion recently in IRC
>which went over why at least some of this is actually self-consistent *for
>perl 6*.
I would be interested in seeing that discussion.
>(That said, there may actually be some lingering
Self-consistency is itself a fuzzy concept.
In any case I am specifically thinking of a discussion recently in IRC
which went over why at least some of this is actually self-consistent *for
perl 6*. I may be able to dig it up again, or hopefully someone else
already has it on tap.
(That said,
Brandon Allbery via RT wrote:
>This should be your hint. Enums *are* numeric, specifically Int.
I'm aware of that, and that's why I call this an LTA rather than
a bug, and why I didn't say conclusively which coercion was wrong.
Indeed, on the basis of the enum/Int subclassing, I proposed in [perl
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Zefram wrote:
> The same goes for coercions from other enum types.
This should be your hint. Enums *are* numeric, specifically Int.
I don't know what language you are trying to force Perl 6 to be, but you
might want to consider the