It looks like this bug hasn't been *completely* fixed:
dd :<+>( "2" ); # 2
dd :<*>( "2" ); # 2
dd [*] "2"; # 2
dd [+] "2"; # 2
dd reduce :<*>, "2"; # 2
dd reduce :<+>, "2"; # "2"
i.e. it doesn't work when using the +
Shouldn’t:
sub ($ is rw) { }
be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign to the
anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is rw”. So most
likely indicates a typo on the user side.
> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:05, Zoffix Znet (via RT)
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
> Shouldn’t:
>
> sub ($ is rw) { }
>
> be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign
> to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is
> rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side.
>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
> Shouldn’t:
>
> sub ($ is rw) { }
>
> be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign
> to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is
> rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side.
>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:13:07 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
> > Shouldn’t:
> >
> > sub ($ is rw) { }
> >
> > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign
> > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:13:07 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote:
> > Shouldn’t:
> >
> > sub ($ is rw) { }
> >
> > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign
> > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #131676]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131676 >
Mu provides iterator method, but when you mix in a role that wants it
implemented, it
