Re: [perl #126940] [BUG] errors for very large right shifts

2017-06-05 Thread Zefram
Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: >For record, all three of the problematic ones now throw. Is that the >desired behaviour? Not the desired behaviour, no. It's a massive improvement over giving the wrong answer, and arguably fixes the bug qua bug, but it's still less than awesome. It would be easy (and

Re: [perl #126940] [BUG] errors for very large right shifts

2017-06-05 Thread Zefram via RT
Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: >For record, all three of the problematic ones now throw. Is that the >desired behaviour? Not the desired behaviour, no. It's a massive improvement over giving the wrong answer, and arguably fixes the bug qua bug, but it's still less than awesome. It would be easy (and