On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 11:03:12AM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > "AT" == Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AT> It would also mean that if anything was overriden anywhere, no
> AT> module code could be read in as bytecode, since it may need to be
> AT> rethreaded to incorporate overr
At 08:45 AM 10/23/00 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>Adam Turoff writes:
>: If Perl bytecode were to become threaded, it would be rather troublesome.
>
>Wasn't actually suggesting it, though similar issues also arise for
>compiling down to efficient C, JVM, or C# IL. Optimizing for Least
>Surprise mean
Adam Turoff writes:
: If Perl bytecode were to become threaded, it would be rather troublesome.
Wasn't actually suggesting it, though similar issues also arise for
compiling down to efficient C, JVM, or C# IL. Optimizing for Least
Surprise means different things in different contexts, but I'd ha
> "AT" == Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AT> If Perl bytecode were to become threaded, it would be rather troublesome.
AT> It would probably require some attribute or early compile time
AT> declaration (in main::BEGIN) to tag specific subs/builtins to be
AT> overridden at runtime.
