This patch doesn't want to apply for me:
patching file examples/assembly/fact.pasm
Hunk #2 FAILED at 35.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file examples/assembly/fact.pasm.rej
patching file examples/assembly/hanoi.pasm
Hunk #2 FAILED at 110.
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects
Here's a later, greater version of the parser. It hopefully addresses all
the limitations listed for the previous parser. New limits:
- While I haven't specified argument contexts for the builtin functions,
it should be possible to do so in the same way as for control
structures).
- Error
I know there was some talk about this extra address parameter recently,
but i'm not sure what the upshot of it is. Right now, tcc is complaining
loudly because the init functions for parrotsub and parrotcoroutine don't
match the init_method_t type in the _vtable structure.
What's the deal
At 09:51 PM 7/3/2002 -0400, Josh Wilmes wrote:
I know there was some talk about this extra address parameter recently,
but i'm not sure what the upshot of it is. Right now, tcc is complaining
loudly because the init functions for parrotsub and parrotcoroutine don't
match the init_method_t type
[restricted to -internals, since that's the only one I'm on]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yes. John Porter suggested that 'maybe Damian should write
[the grammar]?'. Which leads me to postulate an analog to Godwin's
Law, tailored to the perl 6 process, stating that at some point in
any
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/vmgen/
(Sorry if this has been mentioned before...)
--
John Douglas Porter
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
