Under cygwin, ./Configure.pl fails with the message:
Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at
lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm line
Try to add this line
link = 'gcc',
to config/init/hints/cygwin.pl
As a result, it must be in the following way:
Configure::Data-set(
perlhash.pod says:
TODO: Steve Fink sayd:
And if there were a keys() method, then 'defined' and 'exists' are
very different. (And there ought to be, and would be if we weren't
all ignoring Leo's iterator proposal.)
I need to read that proposal :-)
Looks like the proposal got accepted?
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As calling conventions clearly state, that the caller has to save
everything, its probably up to imcc/pcc.c to insert above
statements, if another sub gets called from a
# A note about building shared libraries: Perl5 uses the 'ld2' tool, which
# is installed as part of the perl5 installation. So far, it appears
# parrot can get by with simply using gcc -shared, so we override the
# perl5 Configure defaults and use 'gcc -shared' instead of 'ld2'.
# If this later
# New Ticket Created by Vladimir Lipskiy
# Please include the string: [perl #23276]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23276
OK. I'm starting out a prefixing story and here is
CHAPTER I. The HAS_HEADER_
Index: KNOWN_ISSUES
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/KNOWN_ISSUES,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 KNOWN_ISSUES
--- KNOWN_ISSUES 4 Feb 2003 10:24:45 - 1.8
+++ KNOWN_ISSUES 8 Aug 2003 16:09:11 -
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
Benjamin Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:06 AM +0200 8/8/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[snip]
PMC methods
---
ParrotIO has methods via find_method/invoke. Should that be a general
mechanism in default.pmc with one vtable slot for the meth hash?
We're going
hello,
I just picked up a fresh copy with cvs.
Under cygwin, ./Configure.pl fails with the message:
Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm
line 147
So I tried under win32 (MS VS 6.0). Now, Configure.pl is ok, but nmake ends with a
fatal error.
I
Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
parrot_compiler: No make test:
make fails with missing 'open_i_s' (integer file descriptors
are removed)
This is a two-line fix; I've already commited it. (It still doesn't
actually work, mind, as it makes Parrot segfault when
Togos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This code causes IMCC to hang:
... This started happening around
the time the 'multiple return' bug was
fixed,
Seems to be related with the multiple freeing reported by Michael.
With the workaround it runs fine now.
leo
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure you can optimize it to a jump opcode when you're tail
calling another function can you? You could be tailcalling into a
closure so you'll need to use
list has been about fighting Subversion. However, Arthur did post a mini
status update at the end of July
http://xrl.us/o2s -- Status report
I am having trouble following this url. Is there another?
Ah... bugger. I thought ponie-dev got gatewayed through to news and
Hey all,
Sorry for the huge code listing here, but I don't
have a simpler case. This is what pirate outputs
when it compiles the following program:
def f(x):
if x:
return 1
else:
return 0
print f(1), f(0)
As far as I can
There are a number of ops that could fail. Examples are find_lex but
also the various load and lookup ops. Options for handling failure are:
- Abort parrot
- Throw an exception
- Return a default (null) value
I think it is hard for the parrot designers to decide what language
implementors want
On Friday 08 August 2003 14:16, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:48:17PM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
Now Exec works exactly like the jit, I have checked in the missing
restart, fixed some bugs at Parrot_jit_store_retval and make exec_start
call runops instead of calling
Brent Dax wrote:
TOGoS:
# Personally, I would like = to mean 'set', and
# maybe - do 'assign'.
I usually think of registers as variables with fixed names, so the Perl
6 part of my brain suggests:
$P0 = $P1 #assign
$P0 := $P1 #set
Which is why I suggested,
We totally need to have Parrot running on this thing when it comes
out. :-)
http://www.xgamestation.com/
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();
Vladimir Lipskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the testing
t/pmc/io...NOK 3# Failed test (t/pmc/io.t at line 37)
# got: 'fdopen failed
# '
# expected: 'ok
# '
t/pmc/io...NOK 4# Failed test (t/pmc/io.t at line 51)
# got: 'fdopen
18 matches
Mail list logo
