At 16:15 on 12/30/2003 EST, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your constraints:
2) A perl 5 iThreads it's not a thread, it's a fork. Well, sorta...
mode must be available
For those of us who aren't particularly familiar with ithreads, what does
this imply? What's different, and why
I submitted a patch yesterday to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and received the automated response (the ID is [perl #24789]), but it
doesn't seem to have been forwarded to the mailing list. Is something
up with the tracking system?
JEff
This is going to be extremely light on details with respect to the current state of
the Parrot interpreter.
It is also going to be expressed in terms of Win32 APIs.
For both of these I apologise in advance. Time, and the or forever hold your peace
imperative has overridden my desire to do
On Jan 1, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Josh Wilmes wrote:
At 16:15 on 12/30/2003 EST, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your constraints:
2) A perl 5 iThreads it's not a thread, it's a fork. Well, sorta...
mode must be available
For those of us who aren't particularly familiar with ithreads, what
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:17:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) wrote:
Does Windows do this? (I know other OSes, like VMS, do *not* do it)
If so, how do I enable it? If not, I presume there's some reasonably
simple way to attach a debugger to a process that's died. (I hope)
You can
At 11:21 on 01/01/2004 PST, Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as what level needs to implement them, I'd say that parrot has
to do enough to make it possible for an HLL to expose ithreads-style
threading. Due to the cross-language nature of parrot, practically
speaking this
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:21:57AM -0800, Jeff Clites wrote:
As far as what level needs to implement them, I'd say that parrot has
to do enough to make it possible for an HLL to expose ithreads-style
threading. Due to the cross-language nature of parrot, practically
speaking this probably
This made me think of one of my Gregor's Word of the Week entries,
but when I went looking for it, I realized that it was in the list
of potential future entries, not on the live site.
So, I went ahead and used this occasion to select trichotillomania
for Word of the Week for 2004-01-03:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Do you have a SMP machine with SMP enabled in your OS?
The unpredictable behavior of your freezes makes me think, that it could
be related to multi-threading. OTOH arithmetic tests or such don't
utilize threads and no events are being generated.
I am running a Cray X1 ( I
On Dec 30, 2003, at 5:19 PM, Harry Jackson wrote:
I have also tried strace and got the following.
Try this on parrot rather than Perl.
strace on parrot gets to
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
wait4(-1, [WIFEXITED(s) WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0], 0, NULL) = 8423
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited)
At 11:29 PM + 1/1/04, Harry Jackson wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Do you have a SMP machine with SMP enabled in your OS?
The unpredictable behavior of your freezes makes me think, that it could
be related to multi-threading. OTOH arithmetic tests or such don't
utilize threads and no events are
I just thought I would put forward a summary of how .NET factors its
thread-related data structures. It's a successful, performant, lock-free
design, and I think a quite interesting factorization of what parrot
presently presents as the interpreter. It's the single most successful
threading
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:17:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) wrote:
If so, how do I enable it?
It is possible to configure DrWatson (Stupid cutesy name) to create a dump file,
though I haven't ever found it very useful.
If not, I presume there's some reasonably
There are several very
This is going to be extremely light on details with respect to the current state of
the Parrot interpreter.
It is also going to be expressed in terms of Win32 APIs.
For both of these I apologise in advance. Time, and the or forever hold your peace
imperative has overridden my desire to do
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Just out of curiosity... what version of gcc are you running? We were
having no end of problems with the JIT and one of the mutant versions of
2.95 that redhat was packaging up at one point.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pbin]$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
At 12:34 AM + 1/2/04, Harry Jackson wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Just out of curiosity... what version of gcc are you running? We
were having no end of problems with the JIT and one of the mutant
versions of 2.95 that redhat was packaging up at one point.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pbin]$ gcc -v
NS == Nigel Sandever [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NS REENTRANCY
NS Not only must the VMI be coded in a reentrant fashion, with all state
NS addressed through pointers (references) loaded into it's Virtual
NS register set. All the code underlying it, including syscalls and CRT
NS must
17 matches
Mail list logo
