I've just checked in another SDL example,
examples/sdl/move_parrot_logl.imc. This example uses the cursor keys to
move the logo around. Hitting escape or closing the window exits the
program.
To make the image handling work (and it (ab)uses objects, so that
part'll need to change in the near fut
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 13:40, chromatic wrote:
> I see it on examples/sdl/anim_parrot_logo.imc with a fresh build.
Oops, now I don't. Ignore that; I'll have a better example of weirdness
shortly.
-- c
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 02:17 PM, Melvin Smith wrote:
I will at least commit a patch so IMCC will immediately flag the
declaration of an illegal symbol name rather than allowing it
and then getting confused later.
Perfect!
Thanks.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
Hi Stef,
Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:52:28PM +0100, le valeureux mongueur
> Leopold Toetsch a dit:
Trop long d'introduction. Pas de valeur.
[ precise summary snipped ]
>P3 = PO[P1]# regular keyed access without flag
># set a flag in P1
Hi,
The attached patch clears up some of the warnings you get when compiling
with MS VC++ on Win32.
Jonathan
warnings.patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
> >On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> > > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> > > ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> > > variables
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 13:34, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now, I'm seeing an odd error whenever I use the 'loadlib' op, though:
>
> > set_pmc_keyed_str() not implemented in class 'PerlInt'
> Time for an example ;)
I see it on examples/sdl/anim_parrot_log
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:57:28AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Back from unwellness and the subsequent need to catch up with a stack of
> > stuff, I finally found time to sync up my parrot tree and try a Win32 build.
> > Turns out i
Le Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:52:28PM +0100, le valeureux mongueur Leopold Toetsch a dit:
> Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The implementation of the methods key_* in keys.c imposed
> > to the PMCs to be of type Key. I don't' see the interest
> > for atomic keys that could be mere
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, I'm seeing an odd error whenever I use the 'loadlib' op, though:
> set_pmc_keyed_str() not implemented in class 'PerlInt'
Time for an example ;)
leo
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 15:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> So you create an initializer for that struct (above layout? - a bad name
> BTW) and *assign* it to the screen:
>
> assign screen, screen_struct_layout
> w = screen["w"] # presumed your struct initializer defines that
>
> s. docs/pmcs/st
Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The implementation of the methods key_* in keys.c imposed
> to the PMCs to be of type Key. I don't' see the interest
> for atomic keys that could be mere PMCs.
> This concretely means that one can write the following and save a
> intermediate registe
The get_*_keyed methods were missing from PerlArray. Inheriting from Array did not
cut it when accessing elements beyond the array end.
The patch adds the missing methods. They really are a cut and paste
from the Array methods. They access the corresponding get_*_keyed_int() methods,
or the get_p
The implementation of the methods key_* in keys.c imposed
to the PMCs to be of type Key. I don't' see the interest
for atomic keys that could be mere PMCs.
This concretely means that one can write the following and save a
intermediate register:
P3 = PO[P1]
instead of:
P3 = new P2, .Key
At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> variables with names like $T01JHGJ_001
That can make it kind of nas
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> >Melvin:
> >
> >Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
> >int main () {
> >> int if = 1;
> >>
> >> if (if) {
> >> if = 0;
> >> }
> >>}
>
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we
- Original Message -
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Back from unwellness and the subsequent need to catch up with a stack of
> > stuff, I finally found time to sync up my parrot tree and try a Win32
build.
> > Tur
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 8:19 PM +0100 1/4/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>Its a bit complicated and brain-mangling, the more in the absence of
>>any examples, but the current design in pdd16 seems to lack some
>>flexibility and is IMHO missing the proper handling of the
>>(library
Vladimir Lipsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Seems that we got a problem on alphas then. I can see several solutions
>> to accomodate such CPUs:
> From my point of view, these solutions have the following merits and
> demerits:
>> - use only PMCs t
At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
Melvin:
Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
int main () {
int if = 1;
if (if) {
if = 0;
}
}
do you have a patch? I think its a nice to have so If you sourself
provide a nice patch guess it would be applied :)
I thought I replied to this
I keep forgetting about this, but...
If you want to put in a proposal for OSCON 2004, you've got until
midnight today. (Midnight PST, -0800, I think) What you get for them
varies, but any accepted proposal gets at least admission to the
conference. (Tutorial acceptance gets plane fare and some
> From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Seems that we got a problem on alphas then. I can see several solutions
> to accomodate such CPUs:
>From my point of view, these solutions have the following merits and
demerits:
> - use only PMCs that don't cross cache lines
+) No need for memory
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Back from unwellness and the subsequent need to catch up with a stack of
> stuff, I finally found time to sync up my parrot tree and try a Win32 build.
> Turns out it fails in event.c with a whole string of errors and warnings:-
I've now dis
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch should allow $cpuarch be set correctly whether
> $Config{archname} is "darwin" or "darwin-thread-multi-2level". (It was
> failing in the former case.)
Thanks, applied.
leo
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch implements the inc_i and dec_i ops (cf. math.ops), for the
> Sun/Sparc JIT core.
Thanks, applied.
leo
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Clites
# Please include the string: [perl #26212]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=26212 >
This patch should allow $cpuarch be set correctly whether
$Config{archname} is "darwi
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Peiry
# Please include the string: [perl #26201]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=26201 >
This patch implements the inc_i and dec_i ops (cf. math.ops), for the Sun/Sparc
J
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch below.
Applied, thanks.
> JEff
leo
28 matches
Mail list logo
