Re: Privilege implementation

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Felix Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6. It's a little alarming that if you look for struct ParrotIOData in src/ and include/, you won't find it. I found it, but couldn't figure out why it was there. Leo? Bigger parts of the interpreter like imcc and IO are distinct subsystems and are

Re: Namespaces, part 2

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Next I want to add in the op variants: $Px = find_global [key; key] $Px = find_global $Px, [key; key] $Px = find_global $Py, 'name' I've already proposed some time ago that these variants of namespace manipulation aren't really necessary. I

Re: cvs commit: parrot CREDITS

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - added all people mentioned by courtesy of lines in parrot-cvs messages back to Feb 5th, 2004 Great, thanks. -N: Stéphane +N: St�hane Encodings strike back ;) leo

Re: Parakeet 0.3

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Michel Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Parakeet is an object-oriented Forth-like stack language for the Parrot VM. It is written in PIR and compiled its code directly to PIR. Committed to CVS now. I've replaced the end opcode with this sequence: clear_eh exit 0 and added a comment,

make install thoughts

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
We still have the problem to access runtime files with an installed parrot. So what about this idea: * we have another source file (parrot_config.c) that gets linked to parrot * this source file has basically just one CONST_STRING holding the frozen image of the parrot configuration

Re: make install thoughts

2004-10-05 Thread Jens Rieks
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 13:22, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Comments? What about using miniparrot to create parrot_config.c? jens

Re: [perl #31725] [PATCH] non-branching compare opcodes - tests

2004-10-05 Thread Jens Rieks
On Saturday 02 October 2004 13:10, Stephane Peiry wrote: This patch adds tests for iscompare style ops (isgt, isge, isle, islt, iseq, isne) on integers, numbers and strings, in t/op/comp.t. Thanks, applied. jens

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

2004-10-05 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:39:59 +0100, Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stéphane Payrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 06:09:37PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote: This function is defined in emacs: line-beginning-position is a built-in function.

Re: make install thoughts

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 05 October 2004 13:22, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Comments? What about using miniparrot to create parrot_config.c? Yep. Finally yes. But building miniparrot is another untested step in that process. For now and the release using the regular parrot is

[perl #31848] No %= in PIR

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Dan Sugalski # Please include the string: [perl #31848] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31848 We do all the rest... might as well do this one too. --

Bit more piethon

2004-10-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
Since Sam Ruby's been poking at it, and I'm waiting on the register coloring function to churn, I figured I'd poke at the python converter in CVS a bit. So I did. More ops are done, and things get a bit further on his big list 'o tests than they did before, which is nice. My translator handles

Re: [perl #31848] No %= in PIR

2004-10-05 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 07:40, Dan Sugalski wrote: We do all the rest... might as well do this one too. It'd look a little something like this. Where do PIR tests go, by the way? I didn't see them in a trivial grep. (For future reference through search engines, rebuilding Parrot was a pain

Re: [perl #31848] No %= in PIR

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do all the rest... might as well do this one too. PIR syntax is in. But we don't have 2-arg forms of these opcode. leo

Re: Bit more piethon

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Sam Ruby's been poking at it, and I'm waiting on the register coloring function to churn, I figured I'd poke at the python converter in CVS a bit. So I did. More ops are done, and things get a bit further on his big list 'o tests than they did

Re: [perl #31848] No %= in PIR

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It'd look a little something like this. Thanks, applied ops - rest was already in. Where do PIR tests go, by the way? I didn't see them in a trivial grep. I did : $ find t -name '*.t' | xargs grep /= $ find imcc/t -name '*.t' | xargs grep /= (For future

Re: Bit more piethon

2004-10-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 5:44 PM +0200 10/5/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Sam Ruby's been poking at it, and I'm waiting on the register coloring function to churn, I figured I'd poke at the python converter in CVS a bit. So I did. More ops are done, and things get a bit

Re: Bit more piethon

2004-10-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Dan Sugalski wrote: Since Sam Ruby's been poking at it, and I'm waiting on the register coloring function to churn, I figured I'd poke at the python converter in CVS a bit. So I did. More ops are done, and things get a bit further on his big list 'o tests than they did before, which is nice. My

Re: Bit more piethon

2004-10-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:34 PM -0400 10/5/04, Sam Ruby wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: Since Sam Ruby's been poking at it, and I'm waiting on the register coloring function to churn, I figured I'd poke at the python converter in CVS a bit. So I did. More ops are done, and things get a bit further on his big list 'o

Re: Privilege implementation

2004-10-05 Thread Felix Gallo
Leo writes: Felix Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6. It's a little alarming that if you look for struct ParrotIOData in src/ and include/, you won't find it. I found it, but couldn't figure out why it was there. Leo? Bigger parts of the interpreter like imcc and IO are distinct

Re: Namespaces, part 2

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Clites
On Oct 4, 2004, at 8:25 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Okay, since we've got the *basic* semantics down (unified namespace, namespace entries get a post-pended null character) I'll ask again, what about subs? Do they get name-mangled too? $Px = find_global [key; key; key], 'name' As Leo pointed out

Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Wed 6.10. 18:00 GMT - feature freeze Sat 9.10. 8:00 GMT - code freeze - no checkins please - Parrot 0.1.1 will go out on Saturday. - nice release name wanted leo

Re: Namespaces, part 2

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Clites
On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:58 PM, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote: Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, with that out of the way, let's talk about overlaid namespaces. I don't think I ever read a description of what the purpose of this was. I get the what but not the why. Without the why it's hard to

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Felix Gallo
Leo writes: Wed 6.10. 18:00 GMT - feature freeze Sat 9.10. 8:00 GMT - code freeze - no checkins please - Parrot 0.1.1 will go out on Saturday. - nice release name wanted 'fireparrot'

Re: Namespaces, part 2

2004-10-05 Thread Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:58 PM, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote: You can have the current namespace actually be [ ::Foo::Bar::Baz, ::Foo::Bar, ::* ] (or, for the last one, whatever the namespace that @*ARGS and friends are in is called), so that the search

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Gregory Keeney
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Wed 6.10. 18:00 GMT - feature freeze Sat 9.10. 8:00 GMT - code freeze - no checkins please - Parrot 0.1.1 will go out on Saturday. - nice release name wanted There is a nice list of parrots on the Wikipedia [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parrot ]. I say we go with

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Sebastian Riedel
Leopold Toetsch: - nice release name wanted Firebird or Phoenix sebastian

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
--- Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - nice release name wanted Poicephalus Overall temperament: As a whole have an endearing quality. They have the potential to be very good, well socialized. They are not noisy and raucous nor do they scream for attention. They are able to speak with

RE: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Garrett Goebel
Nice list. My favorites were: Black Lory Purple-bellied Green Pygmy Modest Tiger Malabar Nicobar Red-headed Lovebird Red-faced Scaly-headed Festive Mealy Red-fan Blue-bellied -- Garrett Goebel IS Development Specialist ScriptPro Direct: 913.403.5261

Re: [pid-mode.el] cannot edit

2004-10-05 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 18:22, John Paul Wallington wrote: Jerome Quelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And the minibuffer tells me: Symbol's function definition is void: line-beginning-position I'm using xemacs 21.4.14 You could put something like: (defalias 'line-beginning-position

[perl #31853] [PATCH] `make' in languages/tcl is failing

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matthew Zimmerman # Please include the string: [perl #31853] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31853 --- osname= linux osvers= 2.4.21-4.elsmp arch= i386-linux-thread-multi

Re: [perl #31848] No %= in PIR

2004-10-05 Thread Matthew Zimmerman
chromatic wrote: On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 07:40, Dan Sugalski wrote: We do all the rest... might as well do this one too. It'd look a little something like this. Where do PIR tests go, by the way? I didn't see them in a trivial grep. delurk Apparently in imcc/t... The simple op tests are in

[perl #31850] [PATCH] Remove obsolete files from MANIFEST.generated

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #31850] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31850 This patch removes two files that are no longer generated from

[perl #31849] [PATCH] Slightly quieter and more informative compilation

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #31849] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31849 The following patch makes compilation both slightly quieter and also slightly

Re: [perl #31853] [PATCH] `make' in languages/tcl is failing

2004-10-05 Thread William Coleda
ooh, a patch for Tcl! You're hired. =-) Applied in spirit - I removed all the references to the ops directory entirely, since I'm not using it anymore. (All the ops are now part of lib/expression.imc) Thanks! (must remember to run cvs update -P to catch these things.) Matthew Zimmerman (via RT)

[perl #31859] [TODO] Plain ole Hash

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #31859] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31859 Original Message Subject: Re: Plain ole Hash Date: Mon, 04

[perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #31860] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31860 I tried to clear out some of dependency issues in Makefile, and got lost.

Re: [perl #31849] [PATCH] Slightly quieter and more informative compilation

2004-10-05 Thread Steve Fink
On Oct-05, Andy Dougherty wrote: The following patch makes compilation both slightly quieter and also slightly more informative. Or, with less spin, it fixes bad advice I gave previously. Specifically, I had previously noted that it's generally helpful if the Makefile prints out the

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread Steve Fink
On Oct-05, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Wed 6.10. 18:00 GMT - feature freeze Sat 9.10. 8:00 GMT - code freeze - no checkins please - Parrot 0.1.1 will go out on Saturday. - nice release name wanted 0.1.1 - Hydroparrot 0.1.2 - Helioparrot 0.1.3 - Parrolith 0.1.4 - Perylous 0.1.5 - Porn (um...

Re: Towards 0.1.1 - timetable

2004-10-05 Thread William Coleda
Any chance of getting: 'cd dynclasses; make' working on OS X by then? I've been pestering Dan about it on IRC, but figured a ping to the list wouldn't hurt. Leopold Toetsch wrote: Wed 6.10. 18:00 GMT - feature freeze Sat 9.10. 8:00 GMT - code freeze - no checkins please - Parrot 0.1.1 will go out