Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 2:03 PM -0400 10/11/04, Sam Ruby wrote:
Separate op won't work for Python. Consider:
def f(x,y): return x+y
print f(5,6) # 11
print f(a,b) # ab
Oh, sure it'd work, if you had an ADD_OR_CONCATENATE op with an
appropriate MMD table. :)
Yes, *but we have to do that
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:37 AM -0400 10/11/04, William Coleda wrote:
This is set to go, pending an article on use.perl.org.
If Leo's comfortable that things are Working Fine, then push it out
to parrotcode.org.
While there's always more breakage report after a release then
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #31938]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31938
The get_repr was present in vtable but missing as an op.
I added it and
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch causes src tests to use the shared libparrot, if it exists.
This speeds them up on my system by almost a factor of 3 (due to less
copying, since the .a is so large).
Thanks, applied. #31932 too + a small extension.
leo
Adam Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libnci.so fails to build on amd64/Linux because nci_test.o isn't
compiled with -fPIC, which is a requirement of assembling a shared
library on that platform.
It's linked with -fPIC [1], but that might be wrong of course. If we've
to compile with -fPIC, we
Stephane Payrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ ./ops/pmc.ops 2004-10-11 22:30:10.819391992 +0200
+op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
+$1 = $2-vtable-get_repr(interpreter, $2);
+goto NEXT();
To op or not to op that's again the question. Pie-thon code just does:
$Py = $Px.repr()
or
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #31949]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31949
The Complex PMC arithmetic MMD vtables (add, subtract, divide) blindly
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 2:03 PM -0400 10/11/04, Sam Ruby wrote:
Separate op won't work for Python. Consider:
def f(x,y): return x+y
print f(5,6) # 11
print f(a,b) # ab
Oh, sure it'd work, if you had an ADD_OR_CONCATENATE op with an
appropriate MMD table. :)
Yes,
Is there an announcement on use.perl.org yet?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:37 AM -0400 10/11/04, William Coleda wrote:
This is set to go, pending an article on use.perl.org.
If Leo's comfortable that things are
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest problem with the message is that it never tells you exactly
*which* file was not found.
Is the error message now more informative?
I can't tell at the moment. The build never got that
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
In Python terms, __add__ is but one of several methods that strings
have. Other common ones include index, join, lower, replace, and split.
I just used __add__ as an example. Of course all (differing) vtables and
methods would need the
I'll see about getting the announcement out on use.perl.org
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #31953]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31953
This patch supports the declaration of multiple identifiers in a
single
+-le 10/10/2004 18:41 +0200, Leopold Toetsch a dit :
| Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| $ ./test
| ok
| $ ./test
| Illegal instruction (core dumped)
|
| Can you proivde a patch to use this CPU for random number generation ;)
I'd love to :-)
| Is the test sane?
I don't know much about that, and I don't
At 6:35 AM -0700 10/12/04, Will Coleda wrote:
Is there an announcement on use.perl.org yet?
Not that I see, no.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:37 AM -0400 10/11/04, William Coleda wrote:
This is set to go, pending an
Didn't get much response last time I came up with this. But as we really
have to improve calling speed, here is again the original text. Below
are some additional remarks.
Original Message
Subject: Register stacks again
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 13:29:20 +0200
From: Leopold
Perl5 has the notion of contexts, where an expression may behave very
differently in string, boolean, or list context. Perl6 intends to expand
that notion. What if the whole context notion were moved down into
Parrot? Every function call and every MMD dispatch could have an
additional context
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest problem with the message is that it never tells you exactly
*which* file was not found.
Is the error message now more informative?
Hello everyone,
I registered myself yesterday, and have recieved a few
emails from various people. I believe everyone here is
busy with some or the other activity related to the
development/testing of perl6/parrot.
I was wondering, whether I would just remain a mere
spectator, or will I get an
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT), Pratik Chandra Roy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering, whether I would just remain a mere
spectator, or will I get an opportunity to do anything
as well.
Please! Jump in!
Since I am a new comer to your group, I would
appreciate if someone
Pratik Chandra Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering, whether I would just remain a mere
spectator, or will I get an opportunity to do anything
as well.
Hello Patrik,
Parrot isn't really an environment where people are *assigned* work;
they just do something that's necessary. If
At 10:47 AM -0700 10/12/04, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Pratik Chandra Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering, whether I would just remain a mere
spectator, or will I get an opportunity to do anything
as well.
If you're using Windows, there are several todo items specifically for
All~
According to the rt messages and back forth, this is resolved...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Ticket/Display.html?id=31026
Is it?
Matt
--
Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory.
-???
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 11:20, Matt Fowles wrote:
According to the rt messages and back forth, this is resolved...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Ticket/Display.html?id=31026
Is it?
It's *more* efficient, yes, but it's not pretty. The interpreter
initializes a couple of NCI subs before it creates
I know that there is no reason why this shouldn't work, but I tried it
anyway: I tried adding methods to existing (builtin) PMCs. In this
case, I added a find method to a PyString (a near clone of PerlString).
What I found was that I could add a regular method, but __init methods
won't get
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:47 AM -0700 10/12/04, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Pratik Chandra Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering, whether I would just remain a mere
spectator, or will I get an opportunity to do anything
as well.
If you're using Windows,
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't/don't have VS.NET, so my implementation in icu.pl only works for
VS6. Sorry. The basic problem is that we have to build from the VS6
project files at the moment. There is, I believe, a way to convert these to
makefiles which we'd ship
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:47:42PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest problem with the message is that it never tells you exactly
*which*
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #31962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31962
Hi,
this a hack that should make support for 'libsyck', a YAML Parser
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:14:29PM -, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Stephane Payrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ ./ops/pmc.ops 2004-10-11 22:30:10.819391992 +0200
+op get_repr(out STR, in PMC) {
+$1 = $2-vtable-get_repr(interpreter, $2);
+goto NEXT();
To op or not to
http://www.parrotcode.org/ has been updated (Thanks, ask.)
The use.perl.org announcement is at:
http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/12/1530208tid=33tid=42
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:35 AM -0700 10/12/04, Will Coleda wrote:
Is there an announcement on use.perl.org yet?
Not that I see, no.
On
31 matches
Mail list logo
