Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks.
The lost son is back, welcome.
The easy one first -- why the object is out-of-band, rather than one
of the parameters.
Parrot's got the interesting, and somewhat unfortunate, requirement
of having to allow all subroutines behave as methods
Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To implement tcl's
[info nameofexecutable]
I need to get the name of the exectuable parrot was invoked with. I would
have expected to live in interpinfo, but don't see it there.
The executable name (and all interpreter arguments) are swallowed by
At 10:14 AM -0800 1/18/05, Will Coleda wrote:
To implement tcl's
[info nameofexecutable]
I need to get the name of the exectuable parrot was invoked with. I would
have expected to live in interpinfo, but don't see it there.
Anyone have a pointer to where this is? (If it's not in yet, I'll
add a
At 4:02 PM + 1/19/05, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:54:53AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
parrot. If, on the other hand, we were invoked as:
parrot foo.pbc
then both fullname and basename would be parrot. Unix hashbang (and
Windows file association) invocation may give
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:54:53AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
parrot. If, on the other hand, we were invoked as:
parrot foo.pbc
then both fullname and basename would be parrot. Unix hashbang (and
Windows file association) invocation may give us
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:09:19 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point--we should. That'd mean we'd want to have three sets of
data: the invoked full/base name, the 'program' full/base name, and
the interpreter full/base name.
Then we can use this to have parrot look for
Now that Dan's back, I'd like to make sure we have a roadmap in place for
moving forward.
I had great plans to flesh it out more than I have, but work has intruded. I've
checked in what I have so far in docs/ROADMAP.
I would like to eventually have every single outstanding task documented in RT,
This week's Hall of Shame ticket is [perl #15308]
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=15308
Originally submitted in July of 2002 by Scott Walters, the only activity on the
warnocked ticket was a ping to the list in April of 2004 asking if someone
could rule on the patch. No followups
