Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$S0 = readline $P0
print $S0
$S1 = read $P0, 3
Mixing readline and read isn't really a good idea. Did you try to turn
on/off buffering before changing read modes? See PIO.setbuf().
leo
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The readline opcode returns too many lines. Compare the following pir
with `wc -l`.
unless file goto END
$S0 = readline file
It needs (currently) a test for an empty string:
unless $S0 goto END
I didn't look at the code, if EOF is set
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:53:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$S0 = readline $P0
print $S0
$S1 = read $P0, 3
Mixing readline and read isn't really a good idea. Did you try to turn
on/off buffering before changing read
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:49:06 +0100, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The readline opcode returns too many lines. Compare the following pir
with `wc -l`.
unless file goto END
$S0 = readline file
It needs (currently) a test
Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around? It was used by
make.pl, but that was deleted more than a year ago. Grepping the
parrot directory returns no occurrences of 'use Make;'.
If it is deleted, #15988 (Make.pl might load the wrong Make.pm) can be closed.
--
matt diephouse
At 5:04 PM -0500 1/18/05, Sam Ruby wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Hi folks.
Welcome back!
Parrot's got the interesting, and somewhat unfortunate, requirement
of having to allow all subroutines behave as methods and all
methods behave as subroutines. (This is a perl 5 thing, but we have
to make it
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 5:04 PM -0500 1/18/05, Sam Ruby wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Hi folks.
Welcome back!
Parrot's got the interesting, and somewhat unfortunate, requirement
of having to allow all subroutines behave as methods and all methods
behave as subroutines. (This is a perl 5 thing, but
Luke Palmer wrote:
Sam Ruby writes:
Mmm, syntax! :) Luckily it makes no difference to us at the parrot
level. What that should translate to is something like:
$P0 = find_method Parrot_string, find
# Elided check for failed lookup and fallback to attribute fetch
$P1 =
Sam Ruby writes:
Mmm, syntax! :) Luckily it makes no difference to us at the parrot
level. What that should translate to is something like:
$P0 = find_method Parrot_string, find
# Elided check for failed lookup and fallback to attribute fetch
$P1 =
Sam Ruby wrote:
Now, what should the code for function f look like? The only
reasonable answer is something along the lines of:
getattribute $P0, P5, 'find'
I doubt that. All languages have different semantics, and we can't
implement them all, because they are conflicting. You, as a compiler
10 matches
Mail list logo
