This is a uselessly generic TODO that was cribbed from a file in the
repository. It's covered by other, more specific documentation todos. If
you know of documentation that needs to be added, please open a specific
ticket.
There are some potentially crufty tickets out there. Can the relevant experts
verify if these can be closed before we get the next release out?
Win32: (10 tickets)
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/List.html?Field=Platform&Value=mswin32
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/List.html?Field=Platf
More updates:
1) changed the tclparser PMC to emit actual real_exceptions in several cases;
and
2) Added a divide method to TclInt to override the default Integer behavior of promotion to float (This is
necesssary because Tcl's floats stringify with ".0", always - so while [expr 6.0 / 2] is
"3.0
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:33:57PM +0200, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
> > Just a short question I'm interested in: where will be, and how will
> > work (I just asking for a general description about it) the regular
> > expression / rules part of Parrot?
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 09:38 -0500, Patrick R
Ok. I was somewhat surprised to hear about the Tcl breakages recently. I
expect that Tcl is going to work on all of Parrot's supported OSen. Here are
some recent improvements.
o fixed the most gratuitous GC errors that Leo diagnosed.
o committed a patch so that PGE is built by default (per chip).
Cool. Can I co-opt this so I can get tcl-like backtraces when running tcl code?
If so, how? =-)
Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
the new backtrace code is in. If a parrot program aborts due to an error, a
backtrace is shown. Examples:
Null PMC access in invoke()
current instr.: 'd' pc 149 (t/op/debu
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The recent conversion to mostly defaulting to ascii has broken Tcl (*again*).
./parrot languages/tcl/tcl.pbc languages/tcl/examples/hello.tcl
No, I don't think so.
$ ./parrot languages/tcl/tcl.pbc languages/tcl/examples/hello.tcl
He
At 04:52 PM 4/18/2005, chromatic wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:44 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Yep. As a first step, I'd redefine this to be C<.label>:
>
>.macro SpinForever (Count)
> .label $LOOP: dec .COUNT# ".label $LOOP" defines a local label.
>branch .$LOO
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:44 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Yep. As a first step, I'd redefine this to be C<.label>:
>
>.macro SpinForever (Count)
> .label $LOOP: dec .COUNT# ".label $LOOP" defines a local label.
>branch .$LOOP # Jump to said label.
>.endm
Ca
Hi,
the new backtrace code is in. If a parrot program aborts due to an error, a
backtrace is shown. Examples:
Null PMC access in invoke()
current instr.: 'd' pc 149 (t/op/debuginfo_4.imc:24)
called from Sub 'c' pc 116 (t/op/debuginfo_4.imc:18)
called from Sub 'b' pc 85 (t/op/debuginfo_4.im
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Macros support labels, defined using B<.local>, that are local to a
> given macro expansion. The syntax looks something like this:
> .macro SpinForever (Count)
> .local $LOOP: dec .COUNT# ".local $LOOP" defines a local label.
>
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5) new opcodes that return a new result:
> Px = n_add Py, Pz # new Px created
> These opcodes will be done RSN.
RSN is now. There is one basic test in t/pmc/integer.t. Overloading
is tested in mmd.t.
More tests are welcome for other PMCs.
Cav
Below is some stuff, which I'm unsure of how it should be implemented
eventually. Input is highly welcome.
Thanks,
leo
TODO items and design issues
1) bitwise or, and, xor
We currently have two distinct sets of opcodes and MMD functions for
numeric (i.e. integer) and string bitwise functionalit
Below inline/attached describes what's done until now.
leo
According to the proposed changes described in
Subject: [PROPOSAL] infix MMD operators
Subject: Again the infix ops
the following is done:
1) Arithmetic infix opcodes add, sub, mul, div, fdiv, mod, cmod, pow
are converted to use t
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The recent conversion to mostly defaulting to ascii has broken Tcl (*again*).
> ./parrot languages/tcl/tcl.pbc languages/tcl/examples/hello.tcl
No, I don't think so.
$ ./parrot languages/tcl/tcl.pbc languages/tcl/examples/hello.tcl
Hello World
$ ./parr
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> t/pmc/timerNOK 7# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 8.
Could it be that system load was too high when the test was run, so that
it didn't finish in one second?
leo
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 09:50:28AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: > Is there a bitarray lookup by native int?
>:
>: Yes. All array lookups support a native int index.
> Good, good. Speaking of bitarrays (uint1 in t
17 matches
Mail list logo
