[perl #36623] Deleting Globals/Lexicals

2005-07-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #36623] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36623 > There's currently no way to delete a global or a lexical. mdiep: you should be

Re: [perl #36620] Bug in editor/ops2vim.pl

2005-07-21 Thread jerry gay
actually, it should be while(<>) { applied, thanks. On 7/21/05, via RT Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Amir Karger > # Please include the string: [perl #36620] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/rt

[perl #36620] Bug in editor/ops2vim.pl

2005-07-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Amir Karger # Please include the string: [perl #36620] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36620 > editor/ops2vim.pl says: while (<@ARGV>) { AFAIK, that should be while () {

[perl #36619] [TODO] spawnw return value

2005-07-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #36619] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36619 > the return value from spawnw is highly system dependent as currently implemented. instead,

Re: [PATCH] Pass all of spawnw.t on Win32/MSVC++

2005-07-21 Thread jerry gay
On 7/21/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'll apply this patch today. additionally, i'll add some text to > ops/sys.ops specifying that spawnw should return something > object-like. i've created a TODO ticket in RT for the spawnw > object-like return. > applied, r8660. also opened [perl

Re: [PATCH] Pass all of spawnw.t on Win32/MSVC++

2005-07-21 Thread jerry gay
On 7/21/05, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "jerry gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> if i recall correctly, the options here are: 1) unix-like return value > >> from spawnw everywhere, 2) return platform-specific value, or 3

[PATCH] string_to_cstring memory leaks

2005-07-21 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Hi, From docs/ROADMAP * Memory leak - string_to_cstring returns a malloced string, which isn't freed everywhere A quick grep through the src folder found a few cases like this. I may have missed some, but this patch fixes those I spotted. Compiles, passes all tests (apart from dynclasse

Re: [perl #36615] [PATCH] dump_cfg call

2005-07-21 Thread Curtis Rawls
Apologies, the submitted patch causes some tests to not terminate. This patch is the correct version. -Curtis On 7/21/05, via RT Curtis Rawls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls > # Please include the string: [perl #36615] > # in the subject line of all future corr

Re: [PATCH] Pass all of spawnw.t on Win32/MSVC++

2005-07-21 Thread Jonathan Worthington
"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "jerry gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: if i recall correctly, the options here are: 1) unix-like return value from spawnw everywhere, 2) return platform-specific value, or 3) return some object-like thingy. i don't like option 1, as i believe sp

Re: leo-ctx5 (r8656): test results

2005-07-21 Thread jerry gay
On 7/20/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is fixed now (r8657). > indeed, the results are much better: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t\dynclass\foo.t 8

[perl #36615] [PATCH] dump_cfg call

2005-07-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls # Please include the string: [perl #36615] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36615 > This patch moves the dump_cfg() call from reg_alloc.c to cfg.c, making it more in line

Re: [perl #36606] a new (currently failing) test of pge

2005-07-21 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:25:08AM -0700, Mitchell N Charity wrote: > PGE is currently passing all tests, but failing to run a "large" pugs > grammar (one for p6 regexps). So I transliterated part of the grammar > into a (failing) test. Attached. The test can grow into a full regexp > descrip

call opcodes cleanup

2005-07-21 Thread Leopold Toetsch
There are still some leftovers of the old calling scheme, which I'd like to get rid of (1,2) or change slightly (3): 1) bare invoke This opcode assumes P0 = Sub, P1 = Continuation 2) bare invokecc This opcode assumes P0 = Sub 3) invoke Px This opcode assumes P1 = Continuation, but it has a