From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:24:27 -0700
In: docs/pdds/clip/pddXX_exceptions.pod
As with the I/O PDD, this isn't a final form, it's just a draft to
seed discussion. What's missing? What's inaccurate? What's accurate
for the current state
Sean Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ( http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/12143.txt )
sorry,
http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/cpd_12143.txt
Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for doing this. Can you do it without the autogenerated files
> in there? Those, I expect to have duplicated code.
As soon as I found the autogenerated files, I thought, 'aren't these
( http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/12143.txt )
the ones
On Apr 8, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Sean Sieger wrote:
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If it's really big, we can find a website to host it for a while.
I put the result of doing cpd on parrot/src/*.c:
http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/cpd_12139.txt
Thanks for doing this. Can you do it
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe it's better to run it on a fresh checkout of the parrot source code,
> rather than a built tree.
And this is that result:
http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/cpd_12143.txt
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:13:27PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Sean Sieger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Certainly; but I have a question -- originating in my first view of cpd
> > results, those of httpd hosted at pmd.sourceforge.net -- are the dupes
>
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Sean Sieger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Certainly; but I have a question -- originating in my first view of cpd
> results, those of httpd hosted at pmd.sourceforge.net -- are the dupes
> that are 'waste' only the ones found in one file? Or, maybe better fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Lester) writes:
> This is cool! Thanks for doing it.
My pleasure -- I am looking for a way to contribute.
> Can you rerun it without the files that are apparently intentionally
> dupes of each other? For example, there's jit_cpu.c and exec_cpu.c, and
> apparently are exa
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:00:05AM -0400, Sean Sieger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I put the result of doing cpd on parrot/src/*.c:
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/cpd_12139.txt
This is cool! Thanks for doing it.
Can you rerun it without the files that are apparently intentionally
dup
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it's really big, we can find a website to host it for a while.
I put the result of doing cpd on parrot/src/*.c:
http://mysite.verizon.net/sean.sieger/cpd_12139.txt
10 matches
Mail list logo
