On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:00:42PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
:It is probably true that Perl 6 error handling as currently defined
: could be implemented either way.
Nope, S04 specifically sez:
A C block sees the lexical scope in which it was defined, but
its caller is the dynamic locat
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:53:36 +0200
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
>The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
> code into Continuation:invoke; previously, RetContinuation:invoke and
# New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane"
# Please include the string: [perl #40349]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40349 >
Hi,
This is a patch to (attempt to) close the Cage Cleaner's RT ticket
#40278. The
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Sep 18 13:15:03 2006 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
>The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
> code into Continuation:invoke; previously, RetContinuation:invoke and
> find_exception_handler also did stack-unwinding, and none of the three
> did it quite the same
