Among the features that cannot be missed in a transformation language
(and sorry if that's too obvious) I mention:
* a data structure pattern language
(something between patterns used in Prolog and some functional languages
and XPath)
* and rules that are selected via these patterns (with a c
# New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane"
# Please include the string: [perl #40428]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40428 >
Hi,
This is a patch to return the names and locations of the perl script
and module
# New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane"
# Please include the string: [perl #40429]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40429 >
Hi,
This patch adds a test for the perl code coda in a similar manner to
the C code
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> ++++
> | Offset | Length | Description|
> ++++
> | 0 | 8 | 0xFE 0x50
# New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane"
# Please include the string: [perl #40430]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40430 >
Hi,
This patch renames the C code coda test and removes the Perl-specific
code from
Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 01:39 schrieb Jonathan Worthington:
> Hi,
>
> I've checked in the proposed bytecode PDD and also most of the changes
> that I discussed with Allison earlier today. Feedback on it would be
> greatly appreciated.
Great work, thanks.
> A couple of open questions on thi