Jerry Gay via RT schrieb:
On 5/4/07, via RT Mark Glines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Standardize on PARROT_*_GUARD style names for these lines (some
headers used a style that looks like __PIRLEXER_H instead)
It looks like the __FOO_H convention was only used in compilers/pirc.
There are
I think that the right way to handle paddings for memory alignment
is using the pack(1) pragma directive to make everything fit on 1
byte and ensure by code that what we do is correct (instead of
relaying this task to the compiler).
Of course..if any compiler does not supports this directive we
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 12:32 schrieb pancake:
[ no TOFU please ]
I think that the right way to handle paddings for memory alignment
is using the pack(1) pragma directive to make everything fit on 1
byte and ensure by code that what we do is correct (instead of
relaying this task to the
Matt,
This patch actually broke stuff and was reverted shortly before Parrot
0.4.10. It needs to be reapplied, and then checked that it doesn't
break anything (IIRC there were problems on Win32), hence why the
ticket is still open. I've only just returned from 3 weeks overseas
and haven't
On 01/05/07, Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that that file starts:
/*
This is a version (aka dlmalloc) of malloc/free/realloc written by
Doug Lea and released to the public domain. Use, modify, and
redistribute this code without permission or acknowledgment in any
way
Please review patch.
Index: Configure.pl
===
--- Configure.pl(revision 18438)
+++ Configure.pl(working copy)
@@ -60,8 +60,35 @@
This turns on the user prompts.
+=item C--test
+
+Run certain tests along with
On Sun, 06 May 2007 07:52:04 -0700
Paul Cochrane via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
This patch actually broke stuff and was reverted shortly before
Parrot 0.4.10. It needs to be reapplied, and then checked that it
doesn't break anything (IIRC there were problems on Win32), hence why
On Sun, 06 May 2007 07:52:04 -0700
Paul Cochrane via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
This patch actually broke stuff and was reverted shortly before
Parrot 0.4.10. It needs to be reapplied, and then checked that it
doesn't break anything (IIRC there were problems on Win32), hence why
On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:58:45 -0700
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Fix up the indentation problems caused by the above bullet point.
(TODO: why does t/codingstd/c_indent.t require indentation for #if
and #ifdef, but not for #ifndef?)
As far as I understand c_indent.t,
