Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57468]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57468
There's an ifdef in misc.c to allow us to
2008/8/3 Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Keep an eye out for exception-related problems in the next couple of weeks
before the release.
parrot_debugger has some unresolved symbols.
--
Reini Urban
James Keenan via RT wrote:
Applied to trunk in r29967. s1n++. Rakudo testers: Please put this
through its paces over the next few days so we can flush out any bugs.
No complains from me (as a Rakudo tester), I rather like the new target.
s1n++.
If there are no more complains, I'd suggest to
On Sun Aug 03 19:47:09 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat Aug 02 20:08:36 2008, tetragon wrote:
The Configure test for MMX on Intel chips
Was this a test in t/configure/? t/steps/? or during Configure.pl itself?
During Configure.pl. I can reproduce this on the command line by
I am posting this message to one more mailing list for a few reasons,
but mostly to request that some notice of the work be placed on the
project’s request page, RFP: Parrot needs better smoke reports, if the
results are found to make an adequate contribution the Queryability of
smoke reports.
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Aug 4 13:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with
Ronald Schmidt wrote:
A while back I across the web page: RFP: Parrot needs better smoke
reports (at url:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?rfp_parrot_needs_better_smoke_reports).
After reading the requirements for Queryability I decided to try to
write some web query forms and
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Reini Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parrot_debugger has some unresolved symbols.
Quick fix applied in r30006
--
Salu2
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Bob Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch looks good to me, but the pdd25cx merge seems to have broken
parrot_debugger.c altogether; it won't even compile any more.
I've applied a quick fix in r30006 to make it build again.
--
Salu2
Author: coke
Date: Mon Aug 4 15:57:38 2008
New Revision: 30013
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[docs] Patch from RT #57602, Courtesy Bob Wilkinson bob at fourtheye.org
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
On Mon Aug 04 12:58:18 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Please find the attached patch for a spelling mistake in
docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Bob
Thanks, applied in r30013!
--
Will Coke Coleda
On Sat Jun 14 20:37:53 2008, coke wrote:
On Sat Apr 14 15:46:56 2007, allison wrote:
What I get is:
[oops; continuation 0x188ae28 of type 24 is trying to jump from
runloop
2 to runloop 1]
ok
not ok
from line 252 of src/pmc/continuation.pmc
Looks like this is
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Christoph Otto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl
#57468]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. #
URL:
I edited PDD09 tonight to try and add some details and some
clarification on points that weren't particularly clear before. I have
a few questions that need answering before I can do more:
1) GC_trace_normal and GC_trace_stack_FLAG are defined exactly the
same. However, GC_trace_normal is never
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:36:15 Andrew Whitworth wrote:
I edited PDD09 tonight to try and add some details and some
clarification on points that weren't particularly clear before. I have
a few questions that need answering before I can do more:
1) GC_trace_normal and GC_trace_stack_FLAG
On Thu Aug 30 10:36:23 2007, particle wrote:
below is a brief requirements list for these use cases. at this early
point in the design process, the first two use cases are so similar
we'll consider them together.
12 develop/maintain cross-compilation configuration:
~ specify which
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Andrew Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I edited PDD09 tonight to try and add some details and some
clarification on points that weren't particularly clear before. I have
a few questions that need answering before I can do more:
1) GC_trace_normal and
Author: coke
Date: Mon Aug 4 20:52:39 2008
New Revision: 30019
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/DEPRECATED.pod
trunk/src/vtable.tbl
Log:
[DEPRECATED] remove the integer versions of get_attr set_attr.
Resolves RT
On Thu Dec 13 19:23:46 2007, coke wrote:
from PDD17:
PMC* get_attr(INTERP, PMC* self, INTVAL idx) [deprecated]
Retrieve an attribute value from the PMC (instance object).
[NOTE: Integer index lookups for attributes are deprecated with the new
object metamodel.]
Removed in r30019,
On Thu Dec 13 19:24:43 2007, coke wrote:
From PDD17:
void set_attr(INTERP, PMC* self, INTVAL idx, PMC* value) [deprecated]
Store an attribute value in the PMC (instance object).
[NOTE: Integer index lookups for attributes are deprecated with the new
object metamodel.]
Removed in
20 matches
Mail list logo
