On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:05:25PM +0200, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
One of parrot current limitation is that eval is always a closure.
When using rakudo interactively, one want to introduce new
lexical variable that
# New Ticket Created by Chris Davaz
# Please include the string: [perl #59366]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59366
Fixed a bug in the doc where the method name and doc where mismatched.
Fixed a
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #59374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59374
Summary: pmc2c produces incorrect code for returning negative
integer
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:25:35AM -0700, Chris Davaz wrote:
Fixed a bug in the doc where the method name and doc where mismatched.
Thanks.
Fixed a small bug where, even if the user sets the prompt, a default
prompt ' ' is still printed. Changed it so that a default prompt is
only printed
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #59374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
That fixes it, thanks!
Closing ticket,
Pm
jerry gay wrote:
i believe (without looking) that the pmc pdd calls them vtable functions.
i really wish the vtable methods meme would die. they're not
methods. they are a collection functions which define the api to
access the pmc, parrot's abstract data type.
Yup. vtable functions is what
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
I'm not at all arguing that this automatically means we should call
them methods, but at a conceptual level they certainly seem a lot
like methods, and the vtable implementations contain references to
things like SELF and STATICSELF that make them look awfully
