# New Ticket Created by HG
# Please include the string: [perl #60332]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60332
Build errors with parrot-0.8.0 :-
% gmake
Compiling with:
xx.c
cc -I./include -DNO_HASH_SEED
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 03:30:16 HG wrote:
Build errors with parrot-0.8.0 :-
src/exceptions.c
src/exceptions.c: In function `Parrot_ex_build_exception':
src/exceptions.c:74: `_CONST_STRING_74' undeclared (first use in this
function) src/exceptions.c:74: (Each undeclared identifier is
On Monday 20 October 2008 10:25:06 Mark Glines wrote:
chromatic wrote:
2) What's setting an invalid pointer-to-a-PMC here?
This question is answered at the end of the following dump. (This is
one of the things I nopasted during our IRC discussion last week, thanks
for your guidance in
On Monday 27 October 2008 11:41:22 Carl Mäsak wrote:
I'm running Mac OS X 10.5.4, and can't compile Parrot r32189. I
managed to compile the latest revision (r32196), but only after
updating src/multidispatch.c down to r32188.
The make output for the failing builds is long and not evidently
On Wed Jul 30 13:06:06 2008, coke wrote:
From PDD19:
=item .pragma n_operators [deprecated]
This appears to be the only .pragma; should we leave a placeholder or
just remove .pragma entirely when we remove this particular one?
--
Will Coke Coleda
I'd say kill it, and if we ever want to introduce new pragmas into PIR, we
reintroduce. This way, .pragma keyword is not recognized without a reason.
(recently I've become a great fan of being able to override commandline
options with directives in the file processed; .pragma directive would be
Author: coke
Date: Tue Nov 4 17:46:38 2008
New Revision: 32356
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/DEPRECATED.pod
trunk/compilers/imcc/imc.h
trunk/compilers/imcc/imcc.l
trunk/compilers/imcc/imcc.y
