James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Wed Dec 17 13:29:59 2008, kjs wrote:
I thought I closed it last time. Trying again :-)
kjs
The ticket has 3 dependencies which are still open. Is it possible that
the ticket cannot be resolved until these dependencies are resolved?
Yes, but you can just remove
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
Thanks for the report.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 06:14:36 François PERRAD wrote:
Since the merge of the branch ppd22io, the mode of the stdin stream has
changed. Currently, it isn't possible to peek on stdin.
$ cat peek.pir
.sub 'main'
$P0 = getstdin
$S0 = peek $S0
.end
$ ./parrot
chromatic via RT wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
Thanks
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
enumerator list. (trailcomma)
}
chromatic via RT wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
enumerator list.
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 17:31 -0800, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
chromatic mentioned on #parrot that if we remove PIC, we're going to break
all the
predereferenced runcores. After some discussion, this probably means ripping
out:
16:42 @chromatic Everything other than the default core, the
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:47:23 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
On the other hand, I'm somewhat concerned that Parrot 1.0 will either
itself be rather slow, or will architecturally force HLL implementations
to be slow. While looking for the IRC discussion mentioned by Coke, I
found the