On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:22:31AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> On 7/5/06, via RT David H. Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As bugs go, not a killer, but still...
> >
> >The problem tests are as follows:
> >
> >not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dh
thers. :-)
In any case, I agree that this is not a matter that warrents extensive
discussion. Speculation isn't terribly useful here.
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Just Install Perl. - Chris Nandor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:22:05PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> Anything I'm missing?
I feel obliged to suggest putting HQ9PLUS into the languages directory.
:-)
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"It must be difficult being such a v
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> > > This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
&g
nd
extended version - hq9+42
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
however, if people don't like Perl, they don't have to use it. they
can stay at the office solving their problems while the Perl Mongers
go out and drink. ;)- brian d foy in c.l.p.misc
Thanks to schwern, a couple of glitches in my interpreter have (I think)
been fixed. updated version now replacing old version at
http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/hq9p.pasm
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"Perl Porters, Inc. today announced
I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
interpreter in pasm.
[insert deity here] help us all. :-)
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"It's all eggs
