Re: Anyone has perl 1 docs?

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
minimal - you might be able to retrofit it to Perl1 without too much trouble. But I'd go the virtual machine route too, all else being equal. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: Consting args for vmethods

2007-12-17 Thread Paul Johnson
effect of being read. For example, conversions are cached. Which is where, in C++, you would be using the mutable keyword. I don't think this has yet made it into any C standard, but my knowledge in these areas is a little out of date. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [perl #47886] [TODO] 'make quicktest' target

2007-11-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:01:25PM -0800, Patrick R.Michaud wrote: After much discussion, we decided we'd like to have a make quicktest target that runs a subset of core Parrot tests that verify that the functionality is intact. FWIW, this target is known as coretest in Perl 5. -- Paul

Re: [perl #43338] [TODO] config/auto/va_ptr.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread Paul Johnson
, I'm resolving the ticket. Sorry if this opens it up again. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [perl #41897] [BUG]: Parrot::Pmc2c::STMRef gets 'subroutine prederef redefined' warning

2007-05-01 Thread Paul Johnson
otherwise gone unnoticed, but my first thoughts would be that it was a bug in Devel::Cover. Has anyone managed to shine any additional light on this in the last six weeks? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: Why consting is good

2006-08-13 Thread Paul Johnson
Mixing Cconsts Combining Cconsts on a pointer and its constants can get confusing. Very much so. s/constants/contents/ I suspect? Or maybe s/its constants/what it points to/ ? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [perl #39217] [TODO] legal - eliminate All Rights Reserved.

2006-05-26 Thread Paul Johnson
: The symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word “Copyright,” or the abbreviation “Copr.” I wouldn't have said anything, but your correction seems to indicate that the (C) is important. Is my information outdated? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: suspend and resume opcode

2005-11-04 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:02:42AM -0500, Will Coleda wrote: The mail list strips out .t attachments (Robert? is this necessary?) This was changed on perl5-porters a few weeks ago, and since then I don't recall seeming a marked increase in troff spam. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [CVS ci] class refactoring 1 - Integer

2004-12-10 Thread Paul Johnson
simple parts of perl5. Provided you're not too worried about what's going on under the macros, I suppose. if (SvTRUE(left) != SvTRUE(right)) RETSETYES; else RETSETNO; -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: References to hash elements?

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Johnson
with an unexisting key, it would matter, the one does autovifiy the latter doesn't. I wonder whether this message from Larry might be useful? http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14525.html -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: New Todo

2002-01-29 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:57:16PM +, Simon Cozens wrote: I've started a new TODO list. Remind me of anything else that needs doing; Sandboxes. Has anyone given any thought as to whether Parrot should support use Safe, and if so, how? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

.pl extension

2001-09-14 Thread Paul Johnson
. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code

2001-09-13 Thread Paul Johnson
specific. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: op code bof

2001-07-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: Sure, sounds good. I'll see about having the first draft of the Parrot Assembly Language Manual and Architecture Handbook PDD with me too. (All I need to do now is write it...) The Palmah. Our canon of scripture? -- Paul

Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks

2001-07-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:58:54PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: PJ == Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PJ Some method of attaching a callback function to arbitrary opcodes would PJ be very useful. how would you propose those callbacks be attached without op codes to do