HI,
I authored the thing, but dont' have time and tuits to update it,
unfortunately, sorry.
I think pmichaud was planning to write a new tutorial. we should
consider whether it's worth the effort to update the old one. If so,
the best way would be to go through each episode, and see what
changed,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, jerry gay jerry@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 15:53, Will Coleda w...@coleda.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, kjstol parrotc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT
parrotbug-follo
not a complete disaster...
Adding the extra code to achieve this is also prone for new bugs; I'd say,
let's document it and close the ticket. (pirc does catch these cases)
kjs
--Andrew Whitworth
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, kjstol parrotc...@gmail.com wrote:
I almost couldn't believe how
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT
parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote:
On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
IMCC currently relies on a lot of static globals to carry state, and
cannot reliably restore them when an error occurs. (grep for
static and
I almost couldn't believe how I could have missed that, until I remembered
what was the problem.Thing is, there are some ops (and of course, this
should be possible, as users can load dynops) that have different variants,
with different directions for the first arg. For instance: (can't remember
.HLL has been changed into a one-operand directive:write .HLL 'Tcl'.
the second operand indicated the (I think) shared lib containing the
language's PMCs, if any. Use '.loadlib' for that. So:
.HLL 'Tcl'
.loadlib 'tcl_group'
is equivalent to the old, deprecated and removed:
.HLL 'Tcl',
it's been failing for a while (until quite recently, iirc), but now it seems
ok.Just svn up'ed, and nmake'd test; no failures. I'll report any new
failures to trac, if necessary.
thanks for coming back to me.
Ticket can be closed.
kjs
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:11 AM, James Keenan via RT
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote:
Okay, I've committed a variant of my patch in r35599, but I've run into
some issues while trying to test this. The morph VTABLE interface takes
an INTVAL which represents the PMC type to morph
Hi,
it seems to me this syntax error message indicates that it doesn't know the
opcode 'rebless_subclass'. The parser expects a '(', which indicates that it
wants to parse rebless_subclass as a sub name.
Haven't built parrot in 10 days myself now, so can't tell why it's not
working and whether it
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Will Coleda via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Jan 09 06:43:10 2007, particle wrote:
compilers\imcc\imclexer.c(4310) : warning C4018: '' : signed/unsigned
mismatch
compilers\imcc\imcc.l(662) : warning C4090: 'function' : different
'const' qualifiers
On win32, XP, I get the following test failure, with output:
t/pmc/eval..ok 1/17
t/pmc/eval..NOK 10/17# Failed test
'eval.get_string - same file'
# at t/pmc/eval.t line 319.
# Exited with error code: 1
# Received:
# hello from
11 matches
Mail list logo
