Jeff ---
Rather wordy, I know, but it also points out how many places depend upon
the name 'core' in the current code.
I'm also posting a different version shortly that combines core.ops and
vtable.ops into one core_ops.{c,h,pm}.
Are the vtable ops supposed to be considered 'core' ops? I'm
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 08:46:05AM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
Are the vtable ops supposed to be considered 'core' ops?
Yes. There will probably be other .ops files which make up core ops
too.
I'm hoping this is just a temporary hack due to our lack of full platform
support for dynamic
Rather wordy, I know, but it also points out how many places depend upon
the name 'core' in the current code.
I'm also posting a different version shortly that combines core.ops and
vtable.ops into one core_ops.{c,h,pm}.
-Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- cut here ---
diff -ru
