At 2:38 PM +0200 4/15/05, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I'm not quite sure, but it seems that some of the MMD functions may
better be vtable methods:
- bitwise_sh[rl]*shift by anything other then int?
- bitwise_lsris missing generally
or even just a plain opcode only:
- logical_{or,and,xor}
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 09:50:28AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: > Is there a bitarray lookup by native int?
>:
>: Yes. All array lookups support a native int index.
> Good, good. Speaking of bitarrays (uint1 in t
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 09:50:28AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Is there a bitarray lookup by native int?
:
: Yes. All array lookups support a native int index.
Good, good. Speaking of bitarrays (uint1 in the Perl panoply of
types), is there any built
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>: Above are only the PMC variants. There are optimized forms for array and
>: hash lookup by native types:
>:
>: Px = Py[Iz]
>: Px = Py[Sz]
> Is there a bitarray lookup by native int?
Ye
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Perl 6 tends to distinguish these as different operators, though Perl 5
: > did overload the bitwise ops on both strings and numbers, which newbies
: > found confusing in ambiguous cases, wh
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:11:00PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
: By the same token, couldn't one reasonably ask for a boolean array that
: required BigInt subscripts, even on said 32-bit machine? (Once boolean
: arrays actually store one element per bit, that is.) Or are subscripts
: this large rule
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>: I'm not quite sure, but it seems that some of the MMD functions may
>: better be vtable methods:
>:
>: - bitwise_sh[rl]*shift by anything other then int?
>: - bitwise_lsris missin
From: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:52:53 -0700
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: I'm not quite sure, but it seems that some of the MMD functions may
: better be vtable methods:
:
: - bitwise_sh[rl]*shift by any
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: I'm not quite sure, but it seems that some of the MMD functions may
: better be vtable methods:
:
: - bitwise_sh[rl]*shift by anything other then int?
: - bitwise_lsris missing generally
:
: or even just a plain opcod
I'm not quite sure, but it seems that some of the MMD functions may
better be vtable methods:
- bitwise_sh[rl]*shift by anything other then int?
- bitwise_lsris missing generally
or even just a plain opcode only:
- logical_{or,and,xor} return a PMC depending on the boolean value
What
10 matches
Mail list logo
