I'll pick up borland and play with it, although I won't get to it
until the next cycle. I've got a really old version of Turbo C++ 4.52
left over from school, and free versions of Turbo C++ Explorer are
available for download. I don't promise any miracles, but at least I
will be able to prove that
Andrew Whitworth wrote:
I'll pick up borland and play with it, although I won't get to it
until the next cycle. I've got a really old version of Turbo C++ 4.52
left over from school, and free versions of Turbo C++ Explorer are
available for download. I don't promise any miracles, but at least
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Ron Blaschke r...@rblasch.org wrote:
Some time ago, because of this ticket, I tried with Borland C++ 5.5.1
and 5.82, and failed miserably. But that may just be my bad bcc-foo.
Unless someone's keen for this platform and has access to a fairly new
(within two
Unless this task would make you exceedingly happy, I wouldn't bother.
IMO, there are much higher priority things requiring tuits than trying
to add a fourth compiler for windows, especially before the 1.0
release.
Regards.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Whitworth wknight8...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Blaschke r...@rblasch.org wrote:
Andrew Whitworth wrote:
I'll pick up borland and play with it, although I won't get to it
until the next cycle. I've got a really old version of Turbo C++ 4.52
left over from school, and free versions of Turbo C++ Explorer
