On 4/23/07, Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like either (a) you forgot to attach the patch or (b) RT ate it.
Care to try again? :)
Oops - looks like the former. Here we go...
--
Alek Storm
--- /dev/null 1994-07-17 23:46:18.0 +
+++ ./test.pir 2007-04-20 17:56:48.000
Alek Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07, Allison Randal via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have a test case that shows where the current behavior is incorrect?
The attached test case...
Looks like either (a) you forgot to attach the patch or (b) RT ate it.
Care to try again? :
On 4/19/07, Allison Randal via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have a test case that shows where the current behavior is incorrect?
The attached test case demonstrates that passing NULL from C into PIR,
then passing that value to C, causes the wrong init method to be
called. Yes, it's rar
This patch has been sitting for over a week. Is there a problem?
It's just a bugfix.
--
Alek Storm
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm"
# Please include the string: [perl #42406]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42406 >
This patch fixes the bug in which the "init" vtable method override is
called instead of
