Re: [perl #45965] [RFC] Should slot names still have __ in front?

2008-10-19 Thread Allison Randal
chromatic wrote: On Wednesday 15 October 2008 17:33:58 Will Coleda via RT wrote: With the attached patch, parrot builds and tests with no errors[0]. A re-configure is necessary to regenerate a file. [0] well, no additional or unexpected errors. Works for me. +1 to apply. +1 Allison

Re: [perl #45965] [RFC] Should slot names still have __ in front?

2008-10-18 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 17:33:58 Will Coleda via RT wrote: With the attached patch, parrot builds and tests with no errors[0]. A re-configure is necessary to regenerate a file. [0] well, no additional or unexpected errors. Works for me. +1 to apply. -- c

[perl #45965] [RFC] Should slot names still have __ in front?

2008-10-15 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Oct 02 10:40:14 2007, pcoch wrote: In src/objects.c there is the todo item within Parrot_get_vtable_index(): /* XXX slot_names still have __ in front */ const INTVAL cmp = strcmp(name_c, meth_c + 2); I'm guessing by this comment that they shouldn't anymore... With the