Will Coleda wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT
parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote:
Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
But,
James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Wed Jul 30 16:58:55 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
t/op/arithmetics.t
t/pmc/complex.t
t/pmc/float.t
For the record, according to our Smolder reports for MSWin32, these 3
files have tests that are either still TODO-ed out or are failing
outright on some
Would it be possible to get an update from Win32 users on these tests?
Specifically, output of 'prove -v' for these tests:
t/op/arithmetics.t
t/pmc/complex.t
t/pmc/float.t
(I'm going to assume that the sprintf test is still problematic.)
Thank you very much.
kid51
Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
But, AFAICT, the Smolder server doesn't identify the particular tests
within the file which are failing.
kid51
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
But, AFAICT, the Smolder server doesn't
On Wed Jul 30 16:26:13 2008, coke wrote:
Click Goto first failure. Click Failed. Click the box of the same
color as the failed box: You should see the tap output:
Thanks, Coke. That enabled me to verify that for these 3 test files:
t/op/arithmetics.t
t/pmc/complex.t
t/pmc/float.t
t/op/sprintf.t has been passing on Win32 with VC++ (r29667), see
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/2429
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/2429/351
ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not skip:
MSWin32 VMS
On Sat Mar 29 08:41:56 2008, rblasch wrote:
t/op/sprintf.t
not ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not
skip: MSWin32 VMS hpux:10.20 openbsd netbsd:1.5 irix actual: 0
This particular TODO-ed test has begun to unexpectedly PASS for me on
linux-i386 and darwin-ppc.
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring
to?
For example...
t/op/arithmetics1..26
ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer
ok 2 - take the absolute of
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #52198]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52198
This is one of a series of tickets reporting issues encountered at a
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:06:40 James Keenan wrote:
An experienced Perl-Win32 developer was able to configure Parrot
successfully with 'perl Configure.pl' and build it with 'nmake'. All
Parrot tests passed except those in the 4 named files. See
attachment for output of 'prove -v'.
Any
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring
to?
For example...
t/op/arithmetics1..26
ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer
ok 2 - take the absolute of a native integer
Ah, I see that all I was sent was the output of 'prove' -- not 'prove -v'.
I'll have to see if the original tester can re-run the tests.
13 matches
Mail list logo
