Re: [perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2009-02-22 Thread Reini Urban
Andrew Dougherty schrieb: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote: On Mon Apr 28 23:52:22 2008, coke wrote: While trying to put the macport for 0.6.1 together, I noticed that the install failed. Tracked it down to the fact that --parrot_is_shared=0 seems to be generating a parrot that

Re: [perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2009-02-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Reini Urban wrote: Andrew Dougherty schrieb: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote: On Mon Apr 28 23:52:22 2008, coke wrote: While trying to put the macport for 0.6.1 together, I noticed that the install failed. Tracked it down to the fact

Re: [perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2009-02-17 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote: On Mon Apr 28 23:52:22 2008, coke wrote: While trying to put the macport for 0.6.1 together, I noticed that the install failed. Tracked it down to the fact that --parrot_is_shared=0 seems to be generating a parrot that relies on a shared

Re: [perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2009-02-01 Thread Will Coleda
I haven't touched this since it was initially reported. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:45 PM, James Keenan via RT parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote: On Wed Apr 16 08:03:19 2008, coke wrote: While trying to put the macport for 0.6.1 together, I noticed that the install failed. Tracked it

[perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2008-04-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #53494] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53494 While trying to put the macport for 0.6.1 together, I noticed that the install