Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var

2008-10-07 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, I Sop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:31 PM On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I

Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var

2008-10-04 Thread I Sop
From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:31 PM On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote: I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed

Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var

2008-10-04 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 06:23:42AM -0700, I Sop wrote: From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote: I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed everything, and changed the parameter order for the 'getprop' op. Why

Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var

2008-10-03 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote: I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed everything, and changed the parameter order for the 'getprop' op. Why should this be a PAST::Var node as opposed to simply using a PAST::Op node with :pirop('getprop') and/or

[perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var

2008-10-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by I Sop # Please include the string: [perl #59576] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59576 I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed everything, and changed the parameter order