jerry gay wrote:
i believe (without looking) that the pmc pdd calls them vtable functions.
i really wish the vtable methods meme would die. they're not
methods. they are a collection functions which define the api to
access the pmc, parrot's abstract data type.
Yup. vtable functions is what
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
I'm not at all arguing that this automatically means we should call
them methods, but at a conceptual level they certainly seem a lot
like methods, and the vtable implementations contain references to
things like SELF and STATICSELF that make them look awfully
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 11:22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
trunk/docs/book/ch04_pir_subroutines.pod
trunk/docs/book/ch09_hlls.pod
Log:
[Book] Add some basic info about VTables and HLL namespaces.
Modified: trunk/docs/book/ch04_pir_subroutines.pod
---
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 11:22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
trunk/docs/book/ch04_pir_subroutines.pod
trunk/docs/book/ch09_hlls.pod
Log:
[Book] Add some basic info about VTables and HLL namespaces.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:00:31PM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're not really methods in any PIR or C sense though (I usually use the
term entry), as they're not really inherited nor invoked through a
dispatch scheme [...]
