[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Torkington) writes:
Simon Cozens writes:
So maybe the best thing would be for people to send patches to the
list and Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if, when RT comes online, we could use that to manage the
patches. In other words, patches become open to do
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:20:00PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
does it make sense for patches to be only sent to simon and then we can
be notified by the cvs list? it is hard to track what people are doing
when some patches are in and others are rejected, etc.
NO! Sorry, but I firstly want
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:34:22AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
I wonder if, when RT comes online, we could use that to manage the
patches. In other words, patches become open to do items, which are
cleared when the patches are definitively applied or rejected.
That would be nice;
Yes-
People just need to agree to send all patches to RT first so that
they can be tagged in their subject line, so discussion gets
tracked. For now, RT needs to be CC'ed on followups - soon it
will just listen.
When Simon/Dan/$PATCHER applies/rejects a patch, they can
For those of you who might want to be kept up to date with changes to the
CVS repository, there is a mailing list that posts all the changes to the
repository. Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to start the process.
Dan
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS For those of you who might want to be kept up to date with changes
DS to the CVS repository, there is a mailing list that posts all the
DS changes to the repository. Send mail to
DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] to start the process.
does it make
At 06:20 PM 9/13/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS For those of you who might want to be kept up to date with changes
DS to the CVS repository, there is a mailing list that posts all the
DS changes to the repository. Send mail to
DS
