# New Ticket Created by Roger Browne
# Please include the string: [perl #36136]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36136
1. Added an entry for Amber for parrot to languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS
2
Roger Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Added an entry for Amber for parrot to languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS
Thanks, applied - r8281
PS: The Patch Submission Instructions page
http://www.parrotcode.org/patchfaq.html
says do a diff -u, but I presume a svn diff is what you prefer.
svn diff
in
LANGUAGES.STATUS.
I see that LANGUAGES.STATUS is in a funny text format. Would it be useful to
transform it into something like YAML?
CU, Bernhard
--
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
NEU: WLAN-Router fr 0,- EUR* - auch fr DSL-Wechsler!
GMX DSL = supergnstig kabellos http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
the two new languages 'Span' and 'Parakeet' should be mentioned in
LANGUAGES.STATUS.
Thanks, applied.
leo
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27308]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27308
This patch modifies ./languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS, breaking the current
this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27308
This patch modifies ./languages/LANGUAGES.STATUS, breaking the current
BASIC entry into separate BASIC/compiler and BASIC/interpreter entries.
Why? The ./languages/BASIC directory has two independent subprojects,
./languages
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
Just to round out the record, here's a summary of what I got on
Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and Sun's perl5.005_03 for
'make languages' and 'make languages-test':
make languages
Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
BASIC/compiler [2]
m4
ruby
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 22:12, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
BASIC/compiler [2]
m4
:10:05 -0500
Subject: Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, February 28, 2004
On Saturday 28 February 2004 01:12 am, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
BASIC
: LANGUAGES.STATUS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, at 01:12 AM, Mitchell N Charity
/010_token_string.t255 65280?? ?? % ??
Failed 9/15 test scripts, 40.00% okay. 0/41 subtests failed, 100.00% okay.
make: *** [test] Error 11
$
From: Bryan Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS
Date: Sat, 28
On Saturday 28 February 2004 02:17 pm, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
[...]
m4
[...]
scheme
M4 and scheme pass all tests for me, on Gentoo Linux. myconfig is:
Ok, they both fail on my perl v5.6.0, and
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
Just to round out the record, here's a summary of what I got on
Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and Sun's perl5.005_03 for
'make languages' and 'make languages-test':
make languages:
befunge: OK
bf: OK
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
And these languages were quite broken (bad make test failures):
BASIC/compiler [2]
m4
ruby
scheme
LANGUAGES.STATUS says they all work.
If my
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, at 01:12 AM, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
(1) LANGUAGES.STATUS is out of date.
I found (on linux x86 [1]):
These languages failed to build:
BASIC/interpreter
jako
miniperl
tcl
tcl failed to build? What was the error?
(my current repository doesn't look
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner
? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
---
-
OpenComal
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which is sometimes
fun to use. Saying
Luke Palmer writes:
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
Luke Palmer writes:
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
OpenComal Compiler emiting
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
There it goes again! That was *supposed* to be off-list!
Well, now the entirety of the internals list can learn about English
grammar. Hoo-ray.
You mean American Grammar. I'm pretty
24 matches
Mail list logo
